Kealey G P, Heinle J A, Lewis R W, Pfaller M A, Rosenquist M D
Burn Treatment Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
J Trauma. 1992 Mar;32(3):285-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199203000-00003.
The Cand-tec latex agglutination test was used to analyze 2,575 serum samples from 47 consecutive burn patients at risk for systemic candidiasis and serum samples from 24 nonhospitalized control subjects. One burn patient had systemic candidiasis documented by culture of a deep biopsy specimen. In addition, blood culture produced positive results in one patient with no other evidence of systemic candidiasis. Wound, sputum, mucous membrane, or gastrointestinal tract specimens were cultured in 25 of 47 (53%) patients with no evidence of systemic candidiasis. Surveillance cultures were negative in 19 (40%) patients and there were no signs of systemic candidial infection. The sensitivity of the Candida antigen titer was 100% at titers of greater than or equal to 1:2, greater than or equal to 1:4, greater than or equal to 1:8, and greater than or equal to 1:16. Specificity was 77% at titers of greater than or equal to 1:4, 94% at titers of greater than or equal to 1:8, and 100% at titers of greater than or equal to 1:16. The positive predictive value ranged from 6.0% at greater than or equal to 1:4 to 100% at greater than or equal to 1:16. The negative predictive value was 100% for all titer values. The Cand-tec antigen test shows poor specificity and poor positive predictive value for the detection of systemic candidiasis in burn patients.
采用Cand-tec乳胶凝集试验对47例连续的有系统性念珠菌病风险的烧伤患者的2575份血清样本以及24名非住院对照受试者的血清样本进行分析。一名烧伤患者经深部活检标本培养证实有系统性念珠菌病。此外,一名患者血培养呈阳性,但无其他系统性念珠菌病证据。47例无系统性念珠菌病证据的患者中有25例(53%)对伤口、痰液、黏膜或胃肠道标本进行了培养。19例(40%)患者的监测培养结果为阴性,且无系统性念珠菌感染迹象。念珠菌抗原滴度在大于或等于1:2、大于或等于1:4、大于或等于1:8和大于或等于1:16时的敏感性为100%。滴度大于或等于1:4时特异性为77%,滴度大于或等于1:8时为94%,滴度大于或等于1:16时为100%。阳性预测值在大于或等于1:4时为6.0%,在大于或等于1:16时为100%。所有滴度值的阴性预测值均为100%。Cand-tec抗原检测在烧伤患者系统性念珠菌病检测中显示出较差的特异性和阳性预测值。