Escuro R S, Jacobs M, Gerson S L, Machicao A R, Lazarus H M
Department of Medicine, Ireland Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio.
Am J Med. 1989 Dec;87(6):621-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80393-6.
Serologic tests to detect invasive candidiasis generally have been unreliable. We prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of a new, promising commercial latex particle agglutination test (i.e., Cand-Tec, Ramco Laboratories, Inc., Houston, Texas). This assay detects Candida antigens in serum.
We examined the reliability of Cand-Tec to diagnose invasive candidiasis in 142 consecutive in-patients intensively treated with chemo-radiation therapy. Serum samples were collected at admission and then weekly, until the patients' death or hospital discharge. Evaluation for clinical utility was done using various reference titers. Twenty-nine patients had invasive candidiasis whereas 113 patients did not have documented invasive candidal infections.
At a titer of 1:8, the Cand-Tec test had sensitivity of 38%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 85%. Weekly use of the Cand-Tec test did not improve early detection of invasive candidiasis, providing only a mean interval of 0.4 day from the first positive Cand-Tec result to a definitive diagnosis of invasive candidiasis by blood culture, tissue biopsy, or autopsy. In addition, surveillance cultures from the oropharynx or stool were not helpful in identifying those patients who would develop an invasive fungal infection.
In the context of current clinical management strategies for suspected fungal infection, the Candida antigen detection assay (Cand-Tec) is not a reliable method for diagnosis of deep candidiasis in neutropenic patients. Until better methods of early detection are available, patients at high risk for the development of invasive candidiasis should continue to receive empiric antifungal agent therapy.
检测侵袭性念珠菌病的血清学检测通常不可靠。我们前瞻性地评估了一种新的、有前景的商业乳胶颗粒凝集试验(即Cand-Tec,Ramco实验室公司,得克萨斯州休斯顿)的临床实用性。该检测可检测血清中的念珠菌抗原。
我们检测了Cand-Tec在142例接受强化放化疗的连续住院患者中诊断侵袭性念珠菌病的可靠性。入院时采集血清样本,随后每周采集一次,直至患者死亡或出院。使用各种参考滴度进行临床实用性评估。29例患者患有侵袭性念珠菌病,而113例患者没有记录到侵袭性念珠菌感染。
在滴度为1:8时,Cand-Tec检测的敏感性为38%,特异性为90%,阳性预测值为50%,阴性预测值为85%。每周使用Cand-Tec检测并不能改善侵袭性念珠菌病的早期检测,从首次Cand-Tec检测阳性结果到通过血培养、组织活检或尸检确诊侵袭性念珠菌病的平均间隔仅为0.4天。此外,口咽或粪便的监测培养对于识别那些会发生侵袭性真菌感染的患者并无帮助。
在当前疑似真菌感染的临床管理策略背景下,念珠菌抗原检测试验(Cand-Tec)并非诊断中性粒细胞减少患者深部念珠菌病的可靠方法。在有更好的早期检测方法可用之前,有侵袭性念珠菌病发生高风险的患者应继续接受经验性抗真菌药物治疗。