Reinitz M T, Lammers W J, Cochran B P
Department of Psychology, Boston University, MA 02215.
Mem Cognit. 1992 Jan;20(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03208247.
We demonstrate that subjects will often claim to have previously seen a new stimulus if they have previously seen stimuli containing its component features. Memory for studied stimuli was measured using a "yes"/"no" recognition test. There were three types of test stimuli: target stimuli, which had been presented during study, conjunction stimuli, constructed by combining the features of separate study stimuli, and feature stimuli, in which studied stimulus features were combined with new, unstudied, features. For both nonsense words and faces, the subjects made many more false alarms for conjunction than for feature stimuli. Additional experiments demonstrated that the results were not due to physical similarity between study and test stimuli and that conjunction errors were much more common than feature errors in recall. The results demonstrate that features of stored stimuli maintain some independence in memory and can be incorrectly combined to produce recognition errors.
我们证明,如果受试者之前见过包含新刺激成分特征的刺激,他们往往会声称之前见过该新刺激。使用“是”/“否”识别测试来测量对已研究刺激的记忆。有三种类型的测试刺激:在研究过程中呈现过的目标刺激、通过组合单独研究刺激的特征构建的联合刺激,以及将研究刺激特征与新的、未研究的特征组合而成的特征刺激。对于无意义单词和面部,受试者对联合刺激的误报比对特征刺激的误报多得多。额外的实验表明,结果并非由于研究刺激与测试刺激之间的物理相似性,并且在回忆中联合错误比特征错误更为常见。结果表明,存储刺激的特征在记忆中保持一定的独立性,并且可能会被错误组合以产生识别错误。