• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆虫记忆的建设性本质:以熊蜂为例的研究

The constructive nature of memories in insects: bumblebees as a case study.

机构信息

Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230405. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0405. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0405
PMID:39278255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11449199/
Abstract

The view that human memory is constructive implies that recollections are not necessarily an accurate reproduction of past events. An approach to study this constructive nature of memory is by examining memory errors. In this regard, conjunction errors-i.e. incorrect recollection of new stimuli integrated by components from two previously studied stimuli-have attracted important attention in human memory research. Do animals other than humans make conjunction errors? To investigate this issue, a choice task in which training was not involved was used. Bees experienced two to-be-remembered stimuli. At the test, they were presented with four stimuli: one of the original items (i.e. old), an item made by combining two features of the original items (i.e. conjunction), an item containing a previously presented feature and a new one (i.e. feature), and an item integrated solely by new features (i.e. new). Bumblebees remembered the old items. Importantly, when making memory errors, bumblebees selected conjunction and feature lures more often than new items. These results indicate that bumblebees, like humans, spontaneously make memory conjunction errors and suggest that invertebrates' memories might also be constructive in nature. I suggest that focusing on memory errors is a solid avenue to investigate episodic (like) memory in animals.This article is part of the theme issue 'Elements of episodic memory: lessons from 40 years of research'.

摘要

认为人类记忆具有建构性意味着记忆并不一定是对过去事件的准确再现。研究记忆这种建构性质的一种方法是研究记忆错误。在这方面,联想错误——即错误地回忆由两个先前学习过的刺激的成分整合而成的新刺激——在人类记忆研究中引起了重要关注。除了人类之外,动物会犯联想错误吗?为了研究这个问题,使用了一种不涉及训练的选择任务。蜜蜂经历了两个需要记住的刺激。在测试中,它们会看到四个刺激:一个是原始项目(即旧项目),一个是由原始项目的两个特征组合而成的项目(即联想项目),一个是包含先前呈现的特征和新特征的项目(即特征项目),一个是仅由新特征集成的项目(即新项目)。大黄蜂记住了旧项目。重要的是,当蜜蜂犯记忆错误时,它们会比选择新项目更频繁地选择联想和特征诱饵。这些结果表明,大黄蜂和人类一样,会自发地犯记忆联想错误,这表明无脊椎动物的记忆本质上也可能是具有建构性的。我建议,关注记忆错误是研究动物情景记忆的一个可靠途径。本文是主题为“情景记忆的要素:40 年研究的经验教训”的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/4fc1bb39ec7a/rstb.2023.0405.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/a101684545d6/rstb.2023.0405.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/f7cb7cc10325/rstb.2023.0405.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/4fc1bb39ec7a/rstb.2023.0405.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/a101684545d6/rstb.2023.0405.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/f7cb7cc10325/rstb.2023.0405.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/11449199/4fc1bb39ec7a/rstb.2023.0405.f003.jpg

相似文献

1
The constructive nature of memories in insects: bumblebees as a case study.昆虫记忆的建设性本质:以熊蜂为例的研究
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230405. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0405. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Merging of long-term memories in an insect.昆虫中长期记忆的融合
Curr Biol. 2015 Mar 16;25(6):741-745. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
3
Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.精细加工与识别记忆中的合取错误。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):899-912. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.899.
4
A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中视觉工作记忆误差来源的机理见解。
Elife. 2023 Nov 8;12:RP87442. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87442.
5
Memory-conjunction errors: miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory.记忆联结错误:存储的刺激特征的错误组合会产生记忆错觉。
Mem Cognit. 1992 Jan;20(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03208247.
6
Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors.影响自传体记忆联结错误产生的因素。
Memory. 2016;24(2):204-22. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.998680. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Impairment of constructive memory in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中建构性记忆的损害。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 May;17(3):127-33. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200205000-00006.
8
Is episodic-like memory episodic memory?情景式记忆就是情景记忆吗?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0397. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Facial Recall: Feature-Conjunction Effects in Source Retrieval Versus Item Recognition.面部回忆:源检索与项目识别中的特征结合效应
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Apr;125(2):369-386. doi: 10.1177/0031512517751725. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
10
Transitional gradation and the distinction between episodic and semantic memory.过渡渐变与情景记忆和语义记忆的区别。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230407. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0407. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on "Emotion and autobiographical memory": 14 years of advances in understanding functions, constructions, and consequences.《“情感与自传体记忆”的最新进展》:十四年来在理解其功能、构建及影响方面的进展
Phys Life Rev. 2024 Dec;51:255-272. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Relational reasoning in wild bumblebees revisited: the role of distance.重新审视野生大黄蜂的关系推理:距离的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 15;13(1):22311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49840-5.
2
The signature-testing approach to mapping biological and artificial intelligences.用于绘制生物智能和人工智能图谱的签名测试方法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):738-750. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Fallacious reversal of event-order during recall reveals memory reconstruction in rhesus monkeys.错误的事件顺序逆转揭示了恒河猴的记忆重构。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Sep 15;394:112830. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112830. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Remote Memory and the Hippocampus: A Constructive Critique.远程记忆与海马体:建设性批判。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):128-142. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
False memories with age: Neural and cognitive underpinnings.年龄与错误记忆:神经和认知基础
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:346-359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Dissociating memory traces and scenario construction in mental time travel.在心理时间旅行中分离记忆痕迹与情景构建
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jan;60:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Commentary: Merging of long-term memories in an insect.评论:昆虫中长期记忆的融合
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 16;6:826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00826. eCollection 2015.
8
Merging of long-term memories in an insect.昆虫中长期记忆的融合
Curr Biol. 2015 Mar 16;25(6):741-745. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors.影响自传体记忆联结错误产生的因素。
Memory. 2016;24(2):204-22. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.998680. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
10
Binding of episodic memories in the rat.大鼠情景记忆的绑定
Curr Biol. 2014 Dec 15;24(24):2957-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.074. Epub 2014 Nov 20.