Barclay-Goddard R, Stevenson T, Poluha W, Moffatt M E K, Taback S P
School of Medical Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, School of Medical Rehabiltation, R106-771 McDermot Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0T6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004129.pub2.
Standing balance deficits are common in individuals after stroke. One way to address these deficits is to provide the individual with feedback from a force platform while balance activities are performed. The feedback can take visual and/or auditory form.
To determine if visual or auditory force platform feedback improves the clinical and force platform standing balance outcomes in clients with stroke.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (last searched December 2003), and the following electronic bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2003), EMBASE (1974 to May 2003), CINAHL (1982 to May 2003), PEDro (May 2003), CIRRIE (May 2003) and REHABDATA (May 2003). Reference lists of articles were reviewed and manufacturers of equipment were contacted.
Randomized controlled trials comparing force platform with visual feedback and/or auditory feedback to other balance treatments.
Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, methodological quality, and data extraction. Trials were combined for meta-analysis according to outcome and type of feedback.
We included seven trials (246 participants). Force platform feedback did not improve clinical measures of balance when moving or walking (Berg Balance Scale and Timed Up and Go). Significant improvements in laboratory force platform indicators of stance symmetry were found for regimens using visual feedback (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.31 to -0.04, p = 0.04) and the concurrent visual and auditory feedback (weighted mean difference (WMD) -4.02, 95% CI -5.99 to -2.04, p = 0.00007). There were no significant effects on laboratory postural sway indicators, clinical outcomes or measures of function at follow-up assessment.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Force platform feedback (visual or auditory) improved stance symmetry but not sway in standing, clinical balance outcomes or measures of independence.
中风后个体常存在站立平衡缺陷。解决这些缺陷的一种方法是在进行平衡活动时为个体提供来自测力平台的反馈。该反馈可以采用视觉和/或听觉形式。
确定视觉或听觉测力平台反馈是否能改善中风患者的临床和测力平台站立平衡结果。
我们检索了Cochrane中风小组试验注册库(最后检索时间为2003年12月),以及以下电子文献数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2003年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2003年5月)、EMBASE(1974年至2003年5月)、CINAHL(1982年至2003年5月)、PEDro(2003年5月)、CIRRIE(2003年5月)和REHABDATA(2003年5月)。对文章的参考文献列表进行了审查,并联系了设备制造商。
将测力平台与视觉反馈和/或听觉反馈与其他平衡治疗方法进行比较的随机对照试验。
两名评价者独立评估试验是否纳入、方法学质量和数据提取。根据结果和反馈类型将试验合并进行荟萃分析。
我们纳入了7项试验(246名参与者)。在移动或行走时,测力平台反馈并未改善平衡的临床测量指标(Berg平衡量表和定时起立行走测试)。对于使用视觉反馈的方案(标准化均数差(SMD)-0.68,95%置信区间(CI)-1.31至-0.04,p = 0.04)以及同时使用视觉和听觉反馈的方案(加权均数差(WMD)-4.02,95% CI -5.99至-2.04,p = 0.00007),发现站立对称的实验室测力平台指标有显著改善。在随访评估中,对实验室姿势摆动指标、临床结果或功能测量指标没有显著影响。
测力平台反馈(视觉或听觉)改善了站立时的姿势对称性,但没有改善摆动、临床平衡结果或独立性测量指标。