Coyle Peter V, Ong Grace M, O'Neill Hugh J, McCaughey Conall, De Ornellas Dennis, Mitchell Frederick, Mitchell Suzanne J, Feeney Susan A, Wyatt Dorothy E, Forde Marian, Stockton Joanne
Regional Virus Laboratory, Royal Hospitals Trust, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
BMC Microbiol. 2004 Oct 25;4:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-4-41.
Immunofluorescence and virus culture are the main methods used to diagnose acute respiratory virus infections. Diagnosing these infections using nucleic acid amplification presents technical challenges, one of which is facilitating the different optimal annealing temperatures needed for each virus. To overcome this problem we developed a diagnostic molecular strip which combined a generic nested touchdown protocol with in-house primer master-mixes that could recognise 12 common respiratory viruses.
Over an 18 month period a total of 222 specimens were tested by both immunofluorescence and the molecular strip. The specimens came from 103 males (median age 3.5 y), 80 females (median age 9 y) and 5 quality assurance scheme specimens. Viruses were recovered from a number of specimen types including broncho-alveolar lavage, nasopharyngeal secretions, sputa, post-mortem lung tissue and combined throat and nasal swabs. Viral detection by IF was poor in sputa and respiratory swabs. A total of 99 viruses were detected in the study from 79 patients and 4 quality control specimens: 31 by immunofluorescence and 99 using the molecular strip. The strip consistently out-performed immunofluorescence with no loss of diagnostic specificity.
The touchdown protocol with pre-dispensed primer master-mixes was suitable for replacing virus culture for the diagnosis of respiratory viruses which were negative by immunofluorescence. Results by immunofluorescence were available after an average of 4-12 hours while molecular strip results were available within 24 hours, considerably faster than viral culture. The combined strip and touchdown protocol proved to be a convenient and reliable method of testing for multiple viruses in a routine setting.
免疫荧光和病毒培养是诊断急性呼吸道病毒感染的主要方法。使用核酸扩增诊断这些感染存在技术挑战,其中之一是要满足每种病毒所需的不同最佳退火温度。为克服这一问题,我们开发了一种诊断分子试纸条,它将通用的巢式降落式聚合酶链反应方案与能够识别12种常见呼吸道病毒的内部引物预混液相结合。
在18个月的时间里,共对222份标本进行了免疫荧光和分子试纸条检测。这些标本来自103名男性(中位年龄3.5岁)、80名女性(中位年龄9岁)以及5份质量保证方案标本。病毒从多种标本类型中检出,包括支气管肺泡灌洗、鼻咽分泌物、痰液、尸检肺组织以及咽喉联合拭子。痰液和呼吸道拭子的免疫荧光病毒检测效果不佳。该研究共从79名患者和4份质量控制标本中检测出99种病毒:免疫荧光法检测出31种,分子试纸条检测出99种。试纸条的表现始终优于免疫荧光法,且诊断特异性没有损失。
带有预分装引物预混液的降落式聚合酶链反应方案适用于替代病毒培养,以诊断免疫荧光法检测为阴性的呼吸道病毒。免疫荧光法检测结果平均在4 - 12小时后可得,而分子试纸条结果在24小时内可得,比病毒培养快得多。试纸条与降落式聚合酶链反应方案相结合,被证明是在常规环境中检测多种病毒的一种方便可靠的方法。