Mountain Joanna L, Risch Neil
Department of Anthropological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2117, USA.
Nat Genet. 2004 Nov;36(11 Suppl):S48-53. doi: 10.1038/ng1456.
Descriptions of human genetic variation given thirty years ago have held up well, considering the substantial accrual of DNA sequence data in the interim. Most importantly, estimates of between-group genetic variation have remained relatively low. Despite the low average level of between-group variation, clusters recently inferred from multilocus genetic data coincide closely with groups defined by self-identified race or continental ancestry. This correspondence implies that genetic factors might contribute to unexplained between-group phenotypic variation. Current understanding of the contribution of genes to variation in most complex traits is limited, however. Under these circumstances, assumptions about genetic contributions to group differences are unfounded. In the absence of detailed understanding, 'racial' and 'ethnic' categories will remain useful in biomedical research. Further, we suggest approaches and guidelines for assessing the contribution of genetic factors to between-group phenotypic differences, including studies of candidate genes and analyses of recently admixed populations.
考虑到在此期间DNA序列数据的大量积累,三十年前给出的人类遗传变异描述仍然很适用。最重要的是,群体间遗传变异的估计值一直相对较低。尽管群体间变异的平均水平较低,但最近从多基因座遗传数据推断出的聚类与由自我认定的种族或大陆血统定义的群体密切吻合。这种对应关系意味着遗传因素可能导致群体间无法解释的表型变异。然而,目前对基因在大多数复杂性状变异中所起作用的理解是有限的。在这种情况下,关于基因对群体差异贡献的假设是没有根据的。在缺乏详细了解的情况下,“种族”和“民族”类别在生物医学研究中仍将有用。此外,我们提出了评估遗传因素对群体间表型差异贡献的方法和指导方针,包括候选基因研究和对近期混合群体的分析。