Suppr超能文献

新车评估项目:它能预测车辆在实际碰撞中的相对安全性吗?

The new car assessment program: does it predict the relative safety of vehicles in actual crashes?

作者信息

Nirula Ram, Mock Charles N, Nathens Avery B, Grossman David C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Oct;57(4):779-86. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000106506.34691.b6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Federal motor vehicle safety standards are based on crash test dummy analyses that estimate the relative risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe thoracic injury (STI) by quantifying head (Head Injury Criterion [HIC]) and chest (Chest Gravity Score [CGS]) acceleration. The New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) combines these probabilities to yield the vehicle's five-star rating. The validity of the NCAP system as it relates to an actual motor vehicle crash (MVC) remains undetermined. We therefore sought to determine whether HIC and CGS accurately predict TBI and STI in actual crashes, and compared the NCAP five-star rating system to the rates of TBI and/or STI in actual MVCs.

METHODS

We analyzed frontal crashes with restrained drivers from the 1994 to 1998 National Automotive Sampling System. The relationship of HIC and CGS to the probabilities of TBI and STI derived from crash tests were respectively compared with the HIC-TBI and CGS-STI risk relationships observed in actual crashes while controlling for covariates. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined the sensitivity and specificity of HIC and CGS as predictors of TBI and STI, respectively. Estimates of the likelihood of TBI and/or STI (in actual MVCs) were compared with the expected probabilities of TBI and STI (determined by crash test analysis), as they relate to NCAP ratings.

RESULTS

The crash tests overestimate TBI likelihood at HIC scores >800 and underestimate it at scores <500. STI likelihood is overestimated when CGS exceeds 40 g. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated poor sensitivity and specificity of HIC and CGS in predicting injury. The actual MVC injury probability estimates did not vary between vehicles of different NCAP rating.

CONCLUSION

HIC and CGS are poor predictors of TBI and STI in actual MVCs. The NCAP five-star rating system is unable to differentiate vehicles of varying crashworthiness in actual MVCs. More sensitive parameters need to be developed and incorporated into vehicle crash safety testing to provide consumers and automotive manufacturers with useful tools with which to measure vehicle safety.

摘要

背景

联邦机动车安全标准基于碰撞测试假人分析,通过量化头部(头部损伤标准[HIC])和胸部(胸部重力评分[CGS])加速度来估计创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和严重胸部损伤(STI)的相对风险。新车评估计划(NCAP)结合这些概率得出车辆的五星级评级。NCAP系统与实际机动车碰撞(MVC)相关的有效性仍未确定。因此,我们试图确定HIC和CGS在实际碰撞中是否能准确预测TBI和STI,并将NCAP五星级评级系统与实际MVC中TBI和/或STI的发生率进行比较。

方法

我们分析了1994年至1998年国家汽车抽样系统中驾驶员系安全带的正面碰撞事故。在控制协变量的同时,分别将HIC和CGS与碰撞测试得出的TBI和STI概率的关系,与实际碰撞中观察到的HIC-TBI和CGS-STI风险关系进行比较。受试者操作特征曲线分别确定了HIC和CGS作为TBI和STI预测指标的敏感性和特异性。将TBI和/或STI(在实际MVC中)的可能性估计值与TBI和STI的预期概率(由碰撞测试分析确定)进行比较,因为它们与NCAP评级相关。

结果

当HIC评分>800时,碰撞测试高估了TBI的可能性,而当评分<500时则低估了TBI的可能性。当CGS超过40g时,STI的可能性被高估。受试者操作特征曲线显示HIC和CGS在预测损伤方面的敏感性和特异性较差。不同NCAP评级车辆的实际MVC损伤概率估计值没有差异。

结论

在实际MVC中,HIC和CGS对TBI和STI的预测能力较差。NCAP五星级评级系统无法区分实际MVC中不同耐撞性的车辆。需要开发更敏感的参数并将其纳入车辆碰撞安全测试,以便为消费者和汽车制造商提供衡量车辆安全性的有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验