Nieuwenhuis Sander, Broerse Annelies, Nielen Marjan M A, de Jong Ritske
Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):198-214. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.12.002.
We argue that a general control process, responsible for the activation and maintenance of task goals, is central to the concept of executive function. Failures of this process can become manifest as goal neglect: disregard of a task requirement even though it has been understood (Duncan, 1995). We discuss the results of several published and new experiments using various versions of the antisaccade task in order to investigate the circumstances under which goal neglect is likely to occur. Potentially conflicting results in the literature on adaptive control of saccadic eye movements are argued to be attributable to the extent to which different task versions elicit goal neglect. The results suggest an increased susceptibility to goal neglect of high-functioning older adults (Experiment 1) and of first-episode schizophrenia patients (Experiment 2), but not of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (Experiment 3). However, the degree to which such differences in susceptibility become manifest in task performance, is shown to be strongly influenced by manipulations of the relative saliency of task requirements. Theoretical and methodological implications for the study of executive function are discussed.
我们认为,一个负责激活和维持任务目标的通用控制过程是执行功能概念的核心。这一过程的失败可能表现为目标忽视:即使已经理解任务要求,仍对其置之不理(邓肯,1995年)。我们讨论了几个已发表的和新的实验结果,这些实验使用了各种版本的反眼跳任务,以研究可能发生目标忽视的情况。关于眼球跳动适应性控制的文献中潜在的相互矛盾的结果被认为归因于不同任务版本引发目标忽视的程度。结果表明,高功能老年人(实验1)和首发精神分裂症患者(实验2)更容易出现目标忽视,但强迫症患者(实验3)则不然。然而,这种易感性差异在任务表现中显现的程度,被证明受到任务要求相对显著性操纵的强烈影响。文中还讨论了对执行功能研究的理论和方法学意义。