Realini Tony, Lai Michelle Q, Barber Laurie
Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University Eye Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):2133-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.024.
To determine whether diabetes is a potential source of abnormal test results in glaucoma screening by use of frequency-doubling perimetry.
Observational case series.
Twenty-five patients with diabetes and 25 nondiabetic normal controls, all without cataract or glaucoma.
Frequency-doubling perimetry using the C-20-5 screening mode was performed in 1 randomly selected eye of each participant. Abnormal test results were immediately repeated to reduce artifacts caused by test inexperience. Frequency-doubling technology (FDT) results were assigned a numerical score between 0 (normal) and 87 (no stimuli detected).
Abnormal FDT test scores.
Overall, 7 of 25 (28%) patients with diabetes and 1 of 25 (4%) normal controls had an abnormal test; the 1 normal subject with an abnormal test was subsequently determined to have an abnormal glucose tolerance test. Four of the 7 patients with diabetes with abnormal FDT tests had no evidence of diabetic retinopathy on clinical examination. Patients with diabetes had higher test scores than normal controls (8.9+/-16.9 vs. 1.0+/-4.4, P = 0.028) and had longer test times than normal controls (66.4+/-35.5 seconds vs. 48.3+/-11.2 seconds, P = 0.019).
Frequency-doubling perimetry is abnormal in some patients with diabetes, including some patients with diabetes without clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy. Abnormal FDT testing in diabetic eyes may not represent glaucomatous visual field loss. Diabetes may be a source of "false-positive" test results when this technology is used for glaucoma screening.
确定糖尿病是否是使用倍频视野计进行青光眼筛查时异常检查结果的潜在来源。
观察性病例系列。
25例糖尿病患者和25例非糖尿病正常对照者,均无白内障或青光眼。
对每位参与者随机选择的1只眼睛采用C-20-5筛查模式进行倍频视野计检查。异常检查结果立即重复进行以减少因检查经验不足导致的伪差。倍频技术(FDT)结果被赋予0(正常)至87(未检测到刺激)之间的数值评分。
FDT检查评分异常。
总体而言,25例糖尿病患者中有7例(28%)检查异常,25例正常对照者中有1例(4%)检查异常;检查异常的1例正常受试者随后被确定为葡萄糖耐量试验异常。7例FDT检查异常的糖尿病患者中有4例在临床检查中无糖尿病视网膜病变证据。糖尿病患者的检查评分高于正常对照者(8.9±16.9对1.0±4.4,P = 0.028),且检查时间长于正常对照者(66.4±35.5秒对48.3±11.2秒,P = 0.019)。
一些糖尿病患者的倍频视野计检查结果异常,包括一些无糖尿病视网膜病变临床证据的糖尿病患者。糖尿病眼的FDT检查异常可能并不代表青光眼性视野缺损。当使用该技术进行青光眼筛查时,糖尿病可能是“假阳性”检查结果的一个来源