Sookaneknun Phayom, Richards Robert M E, Sanguansermsri Jaratbhan, Teerasut Chai
Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;38(12):2023-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D605. Epub 2004 Nov 2.
The practice of pharmaceutical care in primary care settings in Thailand is currently not generally accepted.
To evaluate the effect of pharmacist involvement in treatment with hypertensive patients in primary care settings.
The treatment objective was to stabilize the blood pressure (BP) of hypertensive patients in accordance with the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines. Patients were randomly assigned to a pharmacist-involved group (treatment) or a group with no pharmacist involvement (control). Pre- and post-test BPs, tablet counts, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacists' recommendations were recorded. The 6-month study was carried out in Mahasarakham University pharmacy and 2 primary care units. Patients were monitored monthly by reviewing their medications and supported by providing pharmaceutical care and counseling.
From a total of 235 patients, the treatment group (n = 118) had a significant reduction in both systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP compared with the 117 patients of the control group (p = 0.037, 0.027, respectively). The 158 patients (76 treatment, 82 control) with BPs >or=140/90 mm Hg at the beginning of the study showed significant BP reductions (p = 0.002 SBP, 0.008 DBP). The proportion of 158 patients whose BP became stabilized was higher in the treatment group (p = 0.017). The treatment group showed significantly better adherence (p = 0.014) and exercise control (p = 0.012) at the end of the study. Physicians accepted 42.72% of medication modifications and 5.34% of the suggestions for additional investigations.
Hypertensive patients who received pharmacist input achieved a significantly greater benefit in BP reduction, BP control, and improvement in adherence rate and lifestyle modification.
目前,泰国基层医疗环境中药物治疗服务的做法尚未得到普遍认可。
评估药剂师参与基层医疗环境中高血压患者治疗的效果。
治疗目标是根据美国国家高血压预防、检测、评估和治疗联合委员会指南稳定高血压患者的血压(BP)。患者被随机分配到药剂师参与组(治疗组)或无药剂师参与组(对照组)。记录测试前后的血压、药片数量、生活方式改变以及药剂师的建议。这项为期6个月的研究在玛哈沙拉堪大学药房和2个基层医疗单位进行。通过审查患者的药物每月对患者进行监测,并通过提供药物治疗服务和咨询给予支持。
在总共235名患者中,与对照组的117名患者相比,治疗组(n = 118)的收缩压(S)和舒张压(D)均显著降低(分别为p = 0.037,0.027)。在研究开始时血压≥140/90 mmHg的158名患者(76名治疗组,82名对照组)显示血压显著降低(收缩压p = 0.002,舒张压p = 0.008)。治疗组中158名血压稳定的患者比例更高(p = 0.017)。在研究结束时,治疗组的依从性(p = 0.014)和运动控制(p = 0.012)明显更好。医生接受了42.72%的药物调整和5.34%的进一步检查建议。
接受药剂师指导的高血压患者在降低血压、控制血压以及提高依从率和改善生活方式方面取得了显著更大的益处。