Hindle Don, McAuley Ian
and Ian McAuley">
Aust Health Rev. 2004;28(1):119-38. doi: 10.1071/ah040119.
Private health insurance membership declined steadily between 1984 and 1997, after which major government interventions caused it to increase. We review some of the literature and conclude that the increases in membership were probably associated with a loss of equity and cost-effectiveness for the health care system as a whole. We attempt to explain why the government made the changes and conclude that the main factors were vested interests of those who have benefited and a confusion of objectives. The changes may have resulted in a more balanced use of available resources (such as the balance between government and private hospital utilisation) but these and other desirable objectives might have been better achieved in other ways. We advocate that a more serious effort be made in future to ensure that policy takes more account of evidence, logic, and system-wide design and coherence.
1984年至1997年间,私人医疗保险参保人数稳步下降,此后政府的重大干预措施使其有所增加。我们回顾了一些文献,并得出结论:参保人数的增加可能与整个医疗体系公平性和成本效益的损失有关。我们试图解释政府做出这些改变的原因,并得出结论:主要因素是受益人的既得利益以及目标的混淆。这些改变可能导致了可用资源的更均衡使用(如政府医院和私立医院利用之间的平衡),但这些以及其他理想目标或许可以通过其他方式更好地实现。我们主张,未来应做出更认真的努力,以确保政策更多地考虑证据、逻辑以及全系统的设计与连贯性。