• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“还有其他意见吗?”问卷中的开放性问题——研究的祸根还是福音?

"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research?

作者信息

O'Cathain Alicia, Thomas Kate J

机构信息

Medical Care Research Unit, Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 8;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-25.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-4-25
PMID:15533249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC533875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The habitual "any other comments" general open question at the end of structured questionnaires has the potential to increase response rates, elaborate responses to closed questions, and allow respondents to identify new issues not captured in the closed questions. However, we believe that many researchers have collected such data and failed to analyse or present it.

DISCUSSION

General open questions at the end of structured questionnaires can present a problem because of their uncomfortable status of being strictly neither qualitative nor quantitative data, the consequent lack of clarity around how to analyse and report them, and the time and expertise needed to do so. We suggest that the value of these questions can be optimised if researchers start with a clear understanding of the type of data they wish to generate from such a question, and employ an appropriate strategy when designing the study. The intention can be to generate depth data or 'stories' from purposively defined groups of respondents for qualitative analysis, or to produce quantifiable data, representative of the population sampled, as a 'safety net' to identify issues which might complement the closed questions.

SUMMARY

We encourage researchers to consider developing a more strategic use of general open questions at the end of structured questionnaires. This may optimise the quality of the data and the analysis, reduce dilemmas regarding whether and how to analyse such data, and result in a more ethical approach to making best use of the data which respondents kindly provide.

摘要

背景

结构化问卷结尾处惯常设置的“其他意见”这一开放性问题,有可能提高回复率,详细阐述对封闭式问题的回答,并使受访者能够指出封闭式问题未涵盖的新问题。然而,我们认为许多研究人员虽收集了此类数据,但却未能对其进行分析或呈现。

讨论

结构化问卷结尾处的开放性问题可能会带来问题,因为它们处于一种尴尬的状态,严格来说既不是定性数据也不是定量数据,因此在如何分析和报告这些问题方面缺乏清晰度,并且进行分析和报告需要时间和专业知识。我们建议,如果研究人员在开始时能清楚了解他们希望从此类问题中生成的数据类型,并在设计研究时采用适当的策略,那么这些问题的价值就能得到优化。目的可以是从有目的地界定的受访者群体中生成深度数据或“故事”用于定性分析,或者生成可量化的数据,作为抽样人群的“安全网”,以识别可能补充封闭式问题的问题。

总结

我们鼓励研究人员考虑对结构化问卷结尾处的开放性问题进行更具策略性的运用。这可能会优化数据质量和分析,减少在是否以及如何分析此类数据方面的困境,并形成一种更符合道德规范的方法,以充分利用受访者善意提供的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71e/533875/2fa37dab30ea/1471-2288-4-25-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71e/533875/2fa37dab30ea/1471-2288-4-25-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71e/533875/2fa37dab30ea/1471-2288-4-25-1.jpg

相似文献

1
"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research?“还有其他意见吗?”问卷中的开放性问题——研究的祸根还是福音?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 8;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-25.
2
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
3
[Methodologic difficulties in measuring patient satisfaction--discrepancy coming from formulating questions].[测量患者满意度的方法学困难——源于问题表述的差异]
Wiad Lek. 2002;55 Suppl 1:335-40.
4
'Questerviews': using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitative health services research.“问卷调查访谈”:在定性访谈中使用问卷作为整合定性和定量卫生服务研究的一种方法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jul;9(3):139-45. doi: 10.1258/1355819041403268.
5
Patient safety in outpatient surgery: the viewpoint of the healthcare providers.门诊手术中的患者安全:医疗服务提供者的观点。
Ergonomics. 2006;49(5-6):470-85. doi: 10.1080/00140130600568717.
6
Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.处理多问题抑郁量表中的缺失数据:插补方法比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Dec 13;6:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-57.
7
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
8
Fathers and the well-child visit.父亲与健康儿童检查
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.
9
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
10
Open-ended questions in surveys of patients' satisfaction with family doctors.关于患者对家庭医生满意度调查中的开放式问题。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):86-9. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279639.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of a Multi-Site In-Hospital Intervention for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Provision: A Survey of Hospital-Based Clinicians.评估多地点医院内阿片类药物使用障碍治疗干预措施的影响:一项针对医院临床医生的调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09728-8.
2
Recommendations for Addressing In-Hospital Substance Use From a National Delphi Consensus Process.基于全国德尔菲共识程序的住院期间物质使用问题处理建议
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28703.
3
Using intervention mapping to evaluate 'High-Alert,' a brief smartphone intervention to reduce youth cannabis-impaired driving.

本文引用的文献

1
Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.选择、设计并开发你的调查问卷。
BMJ. 2004 May 29;328(7451):1312-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.
2
Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.预测试调查工具:认知方法概述
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023254226592.
3
Preregistration house officers' views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey.预注册住院医师对医学院的经历是否使其为工作做好充分准备的看法:全国问卷调查
使用干预映射法评估“高度警惕”,这是一项通过智能手机进行的简短干预措施,旨在减少青少年大麻影响下的驾驶行为。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0329383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329383. eCollection 2025.
4
Critical Care Nursing Workforce Retention From an Irish Perspective: A National Survey.从爱尔兰视角看重症护理人员的留用情况:一项全国性调查
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70094. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70094.
5
Nursing Students' Perception of Nursing as a Career, Outcome Expectations, Job Satisfaction and Informal Workplace Learning.护理专业学生对护理职业的认知、结果期望、工作满意度及非正式职场学习
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):213. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060213.
6
Peer-to-Peer Mental Health Training: A National Model for Peer Support for Medical and Dental Students.点对点心理健康培训:医科和牙科学生同伴支持的国家模式。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Jun 24;21:11537. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11537. eCollection 2025.
7
Psychometric evaluation of a structured assessment tool for nurse anesthetists' non-technical skills.麻醉护士非技术技能结构化评估工具的心理测量学评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 17;25(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07297-2.
8
Occupational therapy practice to support executive function impairment after acquired brain injury: A UK clinical survey.支持后天性脑损伤后执行功能障碍的职业治疗实践:一项英国临床调查。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Apr;87(4):239-250. doi: 10.1177/03080226231206686. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
Inducing emesis in Australian dogs and cats: agents, adverse effects and antiemetic administration.诱导澳大利亚犬猫呕吐:药物、不良反应及止吐药的使用
Aust Vet J. 2025 Jul;103(7):433-442. doi: 10.1111/avj.13449. Epub 2025 May 6.
10
Assessing unmet need for dental care from the perspective of adults with disabilities: A mixed methods approach.从残疾成年人的角度评估未满足的牙科护理需求:一种混合方法。
Disabil Health J. 2025 Apr 2:101835. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101835.
BMJ. 2003 May 10;326(7397):1011-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1011.
4
Media criticism of doctors: review of UK junior doctors' concerns raised in surveys.媒体对医生的批评:英国初级医生调查中提出的担忧综述
BMJ. 2003 Mar 22;326(7390):629-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7390.629.
5
Why are people dissatisfied with medical care services in Lithuania? A qualitative study using responses to open-ended questions.为什么立陶宛人对医疗服务不满意?一项使用开放式问题回答的定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Feb;15(1):23-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.23.
6
NHS Direct and nurses--opportunity or monotony?国民保健署在线服务与护士——机遇还是单调?
Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Nov;39(8):857-66. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00025-1.
7
Impact of NHS Direct on other services: the characteristics and origins of its nurses.国民保健服务指导热线对其他服务的影响:其护士的特点与出身
Emerg Med J. 2002 Jul;19(4):337-40. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.4.337.
8
The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance.紧急医疗调度系统对于拨打999请求救护车的人的可接受性。
Emerg Med J. 2002 Mar;19(2):160-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.160.
9
Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.问卷的设计与使用:适用于卫生服务人员和患者调查的最佳实践综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31):1-256. doi: 10.3310/hta5310.
10
What do women want? Women's experiences of infertility treatment.女性想要什么?女性的不孕治疗经历。
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jul;53(1):123-33. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00317-8.