• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭血压测量与动态血压监测在降压治疗调整中的比较。

A comparison of home measurement and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment.

作者信息

Niiranen Teemu J, Kantola Ilkka M, Vesalainen Risto, Johansson Jarno, Ruuska Maarit J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2006 May;19(5):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.017
PMID:16647616
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

After a 4-week washout period, patients whose untreated daytime diastolic ambulatory BP averaged > or = 85 mm Hg were randomized to be treated according to their ambulatory or home BP. Antihypertensive treatment was adjusted at 6-week intervals according to the mean daytime ambulatory diastolic BP or the mean home diastolic BP, depending on the patient's randomization group. If the diastolic BP stayed above 80 mm Hg, the physician blinded to randomization intensified hypertensive treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients completed the study. During the 24-week follow-up period both systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly within both groups (P < .001). At the end of the study, the systolic/diastolic differences between ambulatory (n = 46) and home (n = 52) BP groups in home, daytime ambulatory, night-time ambulatory, and 24-h ambulatory BP changes averaged 2.6/2.6 mm Hg, 0.6/1.7 mm Hg, 1.0/1.4 mm Hg, and 0.6/1.5 mm Hg, respectively (P range .06 to .75) A nonsignificant trend to more intensive drug therapy in the ambulatory BP group and a nonsignificant trend to larger share of patients reaching (57.7% v 43.5%, P = .16) the target pressure in the home BP group was observed due to the 3.8 mm Hg difference in ambulatory and home diastolic BP at randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjustment of antihypertensive treatment based on either ambulatory or home BP measurement led to good BP control. No significant between-group differences in BP changes were seen at the end of the study. Additional research is needed to provide more conclusive results.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较家庭血压与动态血压在调整降压治疗中的作用。

方法

经过4周的洗脱期后,未治疗时白天动态舒张压平均≥85mmHg的患者被随机分为根据动态血压或家庭血压进行治疗两组。根据平均白天动态舒张压或平均家庭舒张压,每6周调整一次降压治疗,具体取决于患者的随机分组。如果舒张压持续高于80mmHg,对随机分组不知情的医生会加强高血压治疗。

结果

98例患者完成了研究。在24周的随访期内,两组患者的收缩压和舒张压均显著下降(P<0.001)。研究结束时,动态血压组(n = 46)和家庭血压组(n = 52)在家庭血压、白天动态血压、夜间动态血压和24小时动态血压变化方面的收缩压/舒张压差异分别平均为2.6/2.6mmHg、0.6/1.7mmHg、1.0/1.4mmHg和0.6/1.5mmHg(P值范围为0.06至0.75)。由于随机分组时动态舒张压和家庭舒张压存在3.8mmHg的差异,观察到动态血压组有更强化药物治疗的非显著趋势,以及家庭血压组有更多患者达到目标血压(57.7%对43.5%,P = 0.16)的非显著趋势。

结论

基于动态血压或家庭血压测量调整降压治疗均能实现良好的血压控制。研究结束时,两组间血压变化无显著差异。需要进一步研究以提供更确凿的结果。

相似文献

1
A comparison of home measurement and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in the adjustment of antihypertensive treatment.家庭血压测量与动态血压监测在降压治疗调整中的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 2006 May;19(5):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.017.
2
Self-monitoring of blood pressure promotes achievement of blood pressure target in primary health care.在初级卫生保健中,血压自我监测有助于实现血压目标。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Nov;18(11):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.017.
3
[Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].老年患者中难以控制的动脉高血压。“白大衣效应”的意义
Rev Port Cardiol. 1999 Oct;18(10):897-906.
4
[Profile on circadian blood pressure and the influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment].[原发性高血压患者治疗后昼夜血压及影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Aug;25(8):710-4.
5
Frequent nurse visits decrease white coat effect in stage III hypertension.频繁的护士访视可降低Ⅲ期高血压患者的白大衣效应。
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Jun;17(6):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.007.
6
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
7
Self-measured home blood pressure in predicting ambulatory hypertension.自测家庭血压对动态高血压的预测作用
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Nov;17(11 Pt 1):1017-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.015.
8
Blood pressure levels, risk factors and antihypertensive treatments: lessons from the SHEAF study.血压水平、危险因素与抗高血压治疗:来自SHEAF研究的经验教训。
J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Dec;15(12):841-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001280.
9
The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology-supported program on blood pressure control in primary care.多学科信息技术支持项目对初级保健中血压控制的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 May;2(3):170-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.823765. Epub 2009 May 5.
10
Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure for the management of antihypertensive treatment: a randomized controlled trial.24小时动态血压监测用于抗高血压治疗管理:一项随机对照试验
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Feb;23(2):122-9. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.106. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
White Coat Effect: Is It Because of the Hospital Setting, or Is It Physician-Induced?白大褂效应:是因为医院环境,还是医生导致的?
Cureus. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):e38144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38144. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the management of hypertension.动态血压监测在高血压管理中的应用。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 5;135(9):1027-1035. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002028.
3
Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension.
家庭血压监测:方法学、临床相关性和实际应用:欧洲高血压学会血压监测和心血管变异性工作组 2021 年立场文件。
J Hypertens. 2021 Sep 1;39(9):1742-1767. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002922.
4
Monitoring of Treatment for Arterial Hypertension–The Role of Office, Home, and 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.高血压治疗监测——诊室血压、家庭血压和 24 小时动态血压监测的作用。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jul 12;118(27-28):473-478. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0158.
5
An Assessment of Usual Salt Intake among Older Normotensive Adults in Atonsu, a Suburb of Kumasi in the Ashanti Region of Ghana.加纳阿散蒂地区库马西郊区阿托苏老年血压正常成年人的日常盐摄入量评估
Int J Hypertens. 2020 Oct 21;2020:7053654. doi: 10.1155/2020/7053654. eCollection 2020.
6
The effectiveness of aerobic exercise for hypertensive population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.有氧运动对高血压人群的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Jul;21(7):868-876. doi: 10.1111/jch.13583. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes.家庭血压监测能否改善患者预后?一项比较家庭血压监测与动态血压监测对血压控制及患者预后影响的系统评价。
Integr Blood Press Control. 2015 Jul 3;8:43-9. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S49205. eCollection 2015.
8
Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management.家庭血压监测:在高血压管理中的主要作用。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014 Aug;16(8):462. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0462-8.
9
Improving adherence with amlodipine/atorvastatin therapy: IMPACT study.提高氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀治疗的依从性:IMPACT 研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):598-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00478.x. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
10
Acute aerobic exercise reduces 24-h ambulatory blood pressure levels in long-term-treated hypertensive patients.急性有氧运动可降低长期接受治疗的高血压患者的24小时动态血压水平。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Dec;63(6):753-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000600008.