• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喜好关乎行为:目标追求对自动评价的影响。

Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation.

作者信息

Ferguson Melissa J, Bargh John A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):557-72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557
PMID:15535771
Abstract

Findings from 3 experiments suggest that participants who were actively engaged in goal pursuit, compared with those who were not pursuing the goal, automatically evaluated goal-relevant objects as relatively more positive than goal-irrelevant objects. In Experiment 3, participants' automatic evaluations also predicted their behavioral intentions toward goal-relevant objects. These results suggest the functional nature of automatic evaluation and are in harmony with the classic conceptualization of thinking and feeling as being in the service of "doing" (e.g., S. T. Fiske, 1992; W. James, 1890; K. Lewin, 1926) as well as with more recent work on the cognitive mechanics of goal pursuit (e.g., G. B. Moskowitz, 2002; J. Y. Shah & A.W. Kruglanski, 2002).

摘要

三项实验的结果表明,与未追求目标的参与者相比,积极参与目标追求的参与者会自动将与目标相关的物体评价为比与目标无关的物体相对更积极。在实验3中,参与者的自动评价还预测了他们对与目标相关物体的行为意图。这些结果表明了自动评价的功能性本质,并且与将思维和情感视为服务于“行动”的经典概念化观点(例如,S.T.菲斯克,1992年;W.詹姆斯,1890年;K.勒温,1926年)以及与近期关于目标追求的认知机制的研究(例如,G.B.莫斯科维茨,2002年;J.Y.沙阿和A.W.克鲁格兰斯基,2002年)相一致。

相似文献

1
Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation.喜好关乎行为:目标追求对自动评价的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):557-72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557.
2
On the automatic evaluation of end-states.关于终态的自动评估。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):596-611. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.596.
3
The "instrumentality" heuristic: why metacognitive difficulty is desirable during goal pursuit.“手段性”启发法:为何在目标追求过程中,元认知困难是可取的。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02264.x.
4
Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals.一言为定!制定计划可以消除未实现目标的认知影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):667-83. doi: 10.1037/a0024192.
5
Goal contagion: perceiving is for pursuing.目标感染:感知即追求。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):23-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23.
6
The goal-dependent automaticity of drinking habits.饮酒习惯的目标依赖性自动性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;44(Pt 1):47-63. doi: 10.1348/014466604X23446.
7
When pooping babies become more appealing: the effects of nonconscious goal pursuit on experienced emotions.当拉粑粑的婴儿变得更有吸引力时:无意识目标追求对体验情绪的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1381-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417135. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.
9
Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? A comparison of goal-directed and goal-less actions.自动模仿是基于目标编码还是动作编码?目标导向动作与无目标动作的比较。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(3):213-25. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000190.
10
Nonconscious goal pursuit in novel environments: the case of implicit learning.新环境中的无意识目标追求:以内隐学习为例
Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):261-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02078.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A second chance for first impressions: evidence for altered impression updating in borderline personality disorder.第一印象的第二次机会:边缘型人格障碍中印象更新改变的证据。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Jul 18;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00259-y.
2
The vmPFC-IPL functional connectivity as the neural basis of future self-continuity impacted procrastination: the mediating role of anticipated positive outcomes.前额叶皮层-岛叶皮层功能连接作为未来自我连续性的神经基础影响拖延:预期积极结果的中介作用。
Behav Brain Funct. 2024 May 9;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12993-024-00236-z.
3
Analyzing motivating functions of consumer behavior: Evidence from attention and neural responses to choices and consumption.
分析消费者行为的激励功能:来自对选择和消费的注意力及神经反应的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1053528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1053528. eCollection 2023.
4
A value accumulation account of unhealthy food choices: testing the influence of outcome salience under varying time constraints.不健康食品选择的价值积累账户:在不同时间限制下检验结果凸显性的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jan 12;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00459-6.
5
Operating on Anxiety: Negative Affect toward Breast Cancer and Choosing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.手术治疗焦虑:对乳腺癌的负面情绪与选择预防性对侧乳房切除术。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Feb;43(2):152-163. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221121134. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Prosocial priming and bystander effect in an online context.网络环境中的亲社会启动与旁观者效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:945630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945630. eCollection 2022.
7
All I Need Is Two: The Clinical Potential of Adding Evaluative Pairing Procedures to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Changing Self-, Body- and Food-Related Evaluations.我所需要的只有两个:将评估配对程序添加到认知行为疗法中以改变自我、身体和食物相关评价的临床潜力。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 14;10(20):4703. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204703.
8
The Stroop Task Influences Product Evaluations.斯特鲁普任务会影响产品评估。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:688048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688048. eCollection 2021.
9
Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization.动机性线索整合理论与COVID-19:在内感受、躯体化与激进化之间
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 11;12:631758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.631758. eCollection 2021.
10
Is consumer neural response to visual merchandising types different depending on their fashion involvement?消费者对视觉营销类型的神经反应是否因时尚参与度而异?
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0241578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241578. eCollection 2020.