Gandsas Alex, McIntire Katherine, Montgomery Kevin, Bumgardner Cody, Rice Linda
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street Rd #349 Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;98:99-103.
The telementoring of surgical procedures is currently achieved via a wired infrastructure that usually requires sophisticated videoconference systems. This project represents the first step in assessing the potential for using handheld computers as a mobile alternative to current telementoring systems. Specifically, this project compares a handheld computer to a standard CRT monitor regarding their capability to accurately display video images from an endoscopic procedure. Video images from two previously recorded endoscopic procedures were transmitted from a standard VCR to: 1) a handheld computer (iPAQ 3670 running Pocket PC) via a wireless LAN and 2) a standard CRT monitor via a wired analog connection. The software-used on the handheld device was custom designed to allow 320 X 240 pixel video images to be broadcast in real time. Twenty-three surgical residents who had completed an endoscopy rotation were randomized to watch one of the two videotaped endoscopic procedures on the hand held computer or on the CRT monitor. After viewing the procedure, a ten-question quiz was used to assess the ability of each participant to recognize several anatomic landmarks. The result of each questionnaire was expressed as the percentage of correct responses. Using a crossover design, each participant then viewed the other videotaped procedure using the alternate device and completed a second quiz. The mean test score for each device was calculated, and these data was analyzed using a Student T test. The observed difference between the mean test score associated with the handheld device (77.93 +/- 11.26) and the CRT monitor (81.30 +/- 12.54) was not statistically significant (p<0.41). In addition, regardless of the device used, scores corresponding to video tape one were significantly higher than those recorded for video tape two (84.35 +/- 9.92 vs. 74.35 +/- 11.61; p < 0.01) All participants were able to recognize anatomic landmarks equally well when viewing broadcasted endoscopic procedures on a handheld display or a standard CRT monitor. Handheld computers may have a role in telementoring residents who are performing endoscopic procedures. Further research is needed to evaluate the integration of handheld devices into telementoring and robotic system to perform surgical procedures.
目前,外科手术的远程指导是通过有线基础设施实现的,这通常需要复杂的视频会议系统。本项目是评估使用手持计算机作为当前远程指导系统的移动替代方案的潜力的第一步。具体而言,本项目将手持计算机与标准阴极射线管(CRT)显示器在准确显示内窥镜手术视频图像的能力方面进行了比较。来自两个先前录制的内窥镜手术的视频图像从标准录像机传输到:1)通过无线局域网传输到一台手持计算机(运行掌上电脑的iPAQ 3670),2)通过有线模拟连接传输到一台标准CRT显示器。手持设备上使用的软件是定制设计的,以允许实时播放320×240像素的视频图像。23名完成内窥镜轮转的外科住院医师被随机分配,在手持计算机或CRT显示器上观看两个录像内窥镜手术中的一个。观看手术后,使用一份有十个问题的测验来评估每个参与者识别几个解剖标志的能力。每份问卷的结果以正确回答的百分比表示。采用交叉设计,然后每个参与者使用另一台设备观看另一个录像手术并完成第二次测验。计算每个设备的平均测试分数,并使用学生t检验分析这些数据。与手持设备(77.93±11.26)和CRT显示器(81.30±12.54)相关的平均测试分数之间观察到的差异无统计学意义(p<0.41)。此外,无论使用何种设备,与录像带一对应的分数显著高于录像带二记录的分数(84.35±9.92对74.35±11.61;p<0.01)。当在手持显示器或标准CRT显示器上观看广播的内窥镜手术时,所有参与者识别解剖标志的能力相同。手持计算机在指导进行内窥镜手术的住院医师方面可能有作用。需要进一步研究以评估将手持设备集成到远程指导和机器人系统中以执行外科手术的情况。