Charles Cathy, Gafni Amiram, Whelan Tim
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):338-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00299.x.
Physicians are increasingly urged to practice shared decision-making with their patients. Using a cross-sectional survey, we explored the extent to which Ontario breast cancer specialists report practising shared decision-making with their patients, their comfort level with this approach, and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation.
All Ontario surgeons and oncologists (radiation and medical) treating women with early-stage breast cancer were eligible for this study. Likert scales were used to measure physicians' comfort level with and self-reported use of different treatment decision-making approaches as well as perceived barriers and facilitators to treatment decision-making with patients.
The response rate was 79% for oncologists and 72% for surgeons. More physicians from each specialty (87% of oncologists and 89% of surgeons) expressed high levels of comfort with clinical example 4 (designed to illustrate a shared approach) than with any of the other examples presented (e.g. the informed and paternalistic approach). Similarly, more oncologists and surgeons reported that their usual approach to treatment decision-making was like example 4 than like any other approach presented (56% of oncologists and 69% of surgeons, respectively). Comfort levels with example 4 for oncologists and surgeons were 31% and 20% higher, respectively, than the reported use of this approach. Lack of time and patient anxiety, patient lack of information and/or misinformation, and patient unwillingness or inability to participate were perceived by a substantial minority of both oncologists and surgeons as barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision-making. Key facilitators identified included patients' emotional readiness, support, information and trust in the physician. More research is needed to identify contextual, physician, patient, and interaction factors that will facilitate shared decision-making in the medical encounter and help both parties create an environment conducive to implementing this approach to the extent desired.
越来越多的人敦促医生与患者进行共同决策。通过横断面调查,我们探讨了安大略省乳腺癌专科医生报告与患者进行共同决策的程度、他们对这种方法的舒适度,以及实施过程中感知到的障碍和促进因素。
安大略省所有治疗早期乳腺癌女性的外科医生和肿瘤学家(放疗和内科)均符合本研究条件。使用李克特量表来衡量医生对不同治疗决策方法的舒适度、自我报告的使用情况,以及与患者进行治疗决策时感知到的障碍和促进因素。
肿瘤学家的回复率为79%,外科医生的回复率为72%。与所呈现的其他任何示例(如告知式和家长式方法)相比,各专科中更多的医生(87%的肿瘤学家和89%的外科医生)对临床示例4(旨在说明共同决策方法)表现出高度的舒适度。同样,更多的肿瘤学家和外科医生报告称,他们通常的治疗决策方法更像示例4,而不是所呈现的其他任何方法(分别为56%的肿瘤学家和69%的外科医生)。肿瘤学家和外科医生对示例4的舒适度分别比报告使用该方法的比例高31%和20%。相当一部分肿瘤学家和外科医生认为,时间不足和患者焦虑、患者信息缺乏和/或错误信息,以及患者不愿意或无法参与是患者参与治疗决策的障碍。确定的关键促进因素包括患者的情感准备、支持、信息以及对医生的信任。需要更多的研究来确定情境、医生、患者和互动因素,这些因素将有助于在医疗过程中进行共同决策,并帮助双方营造一个有利于在期望程度上实施这种方法的环境。