Purvis Alison J, Tunstall Helen
The Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK.
Ergonomics. 2004 Dec;47(15):1657-68. doi: 10.1080/00140130412331290880.
Many fabrics and clothing 'systems' have been designed to enhance heat balance and provide greater thermal comfort for the wearer. However, studies on the effects of socks have largely been ignored in clothing research. It has been suggested that the thermal state of the extremities may alter core temperature and mental stress may be a major determinant of skin blood perfusion on the foot. However, no definite conclusions have been drawn. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two different sock types on foot skin temperature and to investigate any impact on whole body thermoregulation and energy expenditure. Sixteen subjects carried out two sessions of treadmill running exercise, one session wearing a standard running sock and one session wearing an ergonomic asymmetric fitted sock. The overall mean heart rate, core (aural) temperature, foot skin temperature, weighted mean skin temperature and sweat rate during exercise were not statistically significant between the sock conditions (p > 0.05). There was a consistent trend in all participants for the ergonomic sock to induce a higher core temperature and higher skin temperatures compared to the standard sock. Overall mean ratings of perceived exertion and ratings of thermal perception were similar for both sock conditions. Participant questionnaires highlighted a general perception that the ergonomic socks had superior cushioning but that the standard socks were comfortable to wear. Despite there being no significant physiological or thermal differences between socks, the ergonomic sock was perceived to be cooler and was the preferred sock which suggests that subjective perceptions may be more important than objective measurements when selecting a sock for wear during prolonged exercise.
许多织物和服装“系统”已被设计用于增强热平衡,并为穿着者提供更高的热舒适度。然而,在服装研究中,关于袜子影响的研究在很大程度上被忽视了。有人提出,四肢的热状态可能会改变核心温度,而精神压力可能是足部皮肤血液灌注的主要决定因素。然而,尚未得出明确结论。本研究的目的是研究两种不同类型的袜子对足部皮肤温度的影响,并调查其对全身体温调节和能量消耗的任何影响。16名受试者进行了两阶段的跑步机跑步运动,一阶段穿着标准跑步袜,另一阶段穿着符合人体工程学的不对称贴合袜子。在不同袜子条件下,运动期间的总体平均心率、核心(耳部)温度、足部皮肤温度、加权平均皮肤温度和出汗率在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05)。与标准袜子相比,符合人体工程学的袜子在所有参与者中都呈现出一种一致的趋势,即会导致更高的核心温度和皮肤温度。两种袜子条件下,总体平均主观用力感觉评分和热感觉评分相似。参与者问卷突出显示了一种普遍的看法,即符合人体工程学的袜子具有更好的缓冲性能,但标准袜子穿着舒适。尽管袜子之间在生理或热方面没有显著差异,但符合人体工程学的袜子被认为更凉爽,是首选的袜子,这表明在选择长时间运动时穿着的袜子时,主观感受可能比客观测量更重要。