Chandra Vidhan, Nelson Heidi, Larson Dirk Russell, Harrington Jeffrey Robert
Departments of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 55905, USA.
Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1221-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1221.
Primary resection has replaced the conventional drainage procedure in the management of patients with generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. This study investigates the impact of primary resection on operative mortality, identifies predictors of mortality, and compares the results with those of our earlier experience.
Primary resection of the perforated diseased segment of the colon is associated with lower mortality rates than the drainage procedure in patients with Hinchey stages 3 and 4 diverticulitis.
Retrospective analysis.
Tertiary care referral center.
We included 138 consecutive patients who underwent emergent operation for generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon (Hinchey stages 3 and 4) during a period of 16 years (January 1983 to May 1999).
The 30-day mortality rate was analyzed and predictors of mortality identified.
Patients were classified as having spreading purulent peritonitis (n = 44, 31.9%), diffuse peritonitis (n = 64, 46.4%), or fecal peritonitis (n = 30, 21.7%). One hundred thirty-one patients (94.9%) underwent primary resection, 6 patients (4.3%) underwent resection and primary anastomosis, and 1 patient required total colectomy and end ileostomy. Thirteen of the 138 patients in the present group died (1983-1998), representing a perioperative mortality rate of 9%. There was no significant difference in mortality when compared with our earlier study (1972-1982), which had a mortality rate of 12%, considering that more than 25% of the patients in that group were managed by colostomy and drainage alone. Factors identified univariately as predictors of mortality were age of more than 70 years (P = .047), 2 or more comorbid conditions (P<.01), obstipation at initial examination (P = .02), use of steroids (P = .01), and perioperative sepsis (P<.001).
Primary resection has become the standard practice for patients with generalized peritonitis complicating diverticulitis. Mortality rates have not significantly declined despite more aggressive surgical management of the septic source. Because advanced age, comorbid conditions, and perioperative sepsis predict mortality, it is suggested that further reduction in mortality will require improvement in medical management of perioperative sepsis and comorbid conditions.
在治疗并发结肠憩室病的弥漫性腹膜炎患者时,一期切除术已取代传统的引流手术。本研究调查一期切除术对手术死亡率的影响,确定死亡率的预测因素,并将结果与我们早期的经验进行比较。
在患有欣奇(Hinchey)3期和4期憩室炎的患者中,对穿孔的病变结肠段进行一期切除术的死亡率低于引流手术。
回顾性分析。
三级医疗转诊中心。
我们纳入了16年间(1983年1月至1999年5月)连续138例因并发结肠憩室病的弥漫性腹膜炎(欣奇3期和4期)而接受急诊手术的患者。
分析30天死亡率并确定死亡率的预测因素。
患者分为脓性扩散性腹膜炎(n = 44,31.9%)、弥漫性腹膜炎(n = 64,46.4%)或粪性腹膜炎(n = 30,21.7%)。131例患者(94.9%)接受了一期切除术,6例患者(4.3%)接受了切除及一期吻合术,1例患者需要行全结肠切除术及末端回肠造口术。本研究组138例患者中有13例死亡(1983 - 1998年),围手术期死亡率为9%。与我们早期的研究(1972 - 1982年)相比,死亡率无显著差异,早期研究的死亡率为12%,因为该组超过25%的患者仅接受结肠造口术和引流治疗。单因素分析确定为死亡率预测因素的因素包括年龄超过70岁(P = .047)、存在2种或更多合并症(P<.01)、初次检查时便秘(P = .02)、使用类固醇(P = .01)以及围手术期脓毒症(P<.001)。
一期切除术已成为并发憩室炎的弥漫性腹膜炎患者的标准治疗方法。尽管对感染源采取了更积极的手术治疗,但死亡率并未显著下降。由于高龄、合并症和围手术期脓毒症可预测死亡率,因此建议进一步降低死亡率需要改善围手术期脓毒症和合并症的医疗管理。