• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索个体对英国国民医疗服务体系检测与追踪系统的公众信任——一项务实的反思性主题分析。

Exploring individual's public trust in the NHS Test and Trace System - A pragmatic reflexive thematic analysis.

作者信息

Babbage C M, Wagner H, Dowthwaite L, Portillo V, Perez E, Fischer J

机构信息

NIHR HealthTech Research Centre in Mental Heath (MindTech), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

School of Computing, Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2024 Apr 4;36:100740. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100740. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100740
PMID:38634005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11021953/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Digital contact tracing uses automated systems and location technology embedded on smartphone software for efficient identification of individuals exposed to COVID-19. Such systems are only effective with high compliance, yet compliance is mediated by public trust in the system. This work explored the perception of individual's trust and expectation of the broader Test and Trace system in the United Kingdom (UK) with the upcoming release of the National Health Service's (NHS) COVID-19 app as a case example.

METHODS

Twelve adults underwent online semi-structured interviews in August 2020, prior to public availability of the COVID-19 app. Pragmatic reflexive thematic analysis was applied inductively to explore common themes between participants, using an organic and recursive process (Braun & Clarke, 2019).

RESULTS

Themes highlighted features of the technology that would be perceived to be trustworthy (Theme 1), and concerns relating to i) whether users would comply with a T&T system (Theme 2) and ii) how a T&T system would handle user's personal data (Theme 3). Two further themes built on aspects of automation within a T&T system and its impact on trust (Theme 4) and how the media altered perceptions of the T&T system (Theme 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants outlined the need for different user requirements that could be built into the NHS COVID-19 app that would support increased adherence. Concurrently, participants raised questions surrounding personal data and privacy of their data, plus the level of automated versus manual tasks, which impacted perception of trust in the app and wider system. Additionally, themes highlighted that T&T systems do not happen within a vacuum, but within a pre-existing environment influenced by variables such as the media and perception of other's compliance to T&T.

IMPLICATIONS

Since it's roll-out, controversies surrounding the UK T&T system include concerns about privacy, stigma and uptake. Considering the current piece of work, which anticipated similar concerns prior to public access to COVID-19 app, engaging with the public may have been an important step in improving the perception and compliance with the app. Principles fundamental to patient and public involvement (PPI) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) such as the inclusion of the public in the early development of research and aligning the outcomes of research and innovation with broader societal values and expectations would have been well-applied to this system and should be applied to future autonomous systems requiring high public uptake.

摘要

背景

数字接触者追踪利用嵌入智能手机软件的自动化系统和定位技术,以高效识别接触过新冠病毒的个体。此类系统只有在高合规率的情况下才有效,而合规率又受到公众对该系统信任度的影响。这项研究以上述即将发布的英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)新冠病毒应用程序为例,探讨了英国民众对更广泛的检测与追踪系统的信任和期望。

方法

在2020年8月新冠病毒应用程序向公众开放之前,12名成年人接受了在线半结构化访谈。采用务实反思主题分析法,通过有机且递归的过程(布劳恩和克拉克,2019),归纳探索参与者之间的共同主题。

结果

主题突出了被认为值得信赖的技术特征(主题1),以及与以下两方面相关的担忧:一是用户是否会遵守检测与追踪系统(主题2),二是检测与追踪系统将如何处理用户的个人数据(主题3)。另外两个主题基于检测与追踪系统中的自动化方面及其对信任的影响(主题4),以及媒体如何改变对检测与追踪系统的看法(主题5)。

结论

参与者概述了在NHS新冠病毒应用程序中纳入不同用户需求的必要性,这些需求有助于提高用户的依从性。同时,参与者提出了有关个人数据及其隐私、自动化任务与人工任务水平等问题,这些问题影响了对应用程序及更广泛系统的信任度。此外,主题还强调检测与追踪系统并非在真空中运行,而是在一个受媒体以及对他人遵守检测与追踪情况的看法等变量影响的现有环境中运行。

启示

自推出以来,围绕英国检测与追踪系统的争议包括对隐私、污名化和使用率的担忧。鉴于当前这项研究在新冠病毒应用程序向公众开放之前就预见到了类似担忧,与公众互动可能是提高对该应用程序的认知度和依从性的重要一步。诸如让公众参与研究早期开发、使研究与创新成果与更广泛的社会价值观和期望保持一致等患者和公众参与(PPI)以及负责任的研究与创新(RRI)的基本原则,本可很好地应用于该系统,也应应用于未来需要公众高度接受的自主系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad2/11021953/220e48278bde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad2/11021953/220e48278bde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad2/11021953/220e48278bde/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring individual's public trust in the NHS Test and Trace System - A pragmatic reflexive thematic analysis.探索个体对英国国民医疗服务体系检测与追踪系统的公众信任——一项务实的反思性主题分析。
Internet Interv. 2024 Apr 4;36:100740. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100740. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
3
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
4
Post-COVID Public Health Surveillance and Privacy Expectations in the United States: Scenario-Based Interview Study.美国新冠疫情后公共卫生监测与隐私预期:基于情景的访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 5;9(10):e30871. doi: 10.2196/30871.
5
The relationship between trust and attitudes towards the COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app in the UK.英国民众对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用程序的信任与态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276661. eCollection 2022.
6
Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.
7
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价与建议
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
9
Modeling Trust in COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps Using the Human-Computer Trust Scale: Online Survey Study.使用人机信任量表对新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序中的信任进行建模:在线调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 13;9(2):e33951. doi: 10.2196/33951.
10
Analysis of the factors affecting the adoption and compliance of the NHS COVID-19 mobile application: a national cross-sectional survey in England.分析影响国民保健制度 COVID-19 移动应用程序采用和遵守情况的因素:英格兰全国横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 13;11(8):e053395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053395.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial for INVENT special issue of the ISRII 2022 meeting.2022年国际康复创新与实施学会(ISRII)会议INVENT特刊社论。
Internet Interv. 2024 May 11;37:100749. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100749. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Fifty Years of Trust Research in Health Care: A Synthetic Review.五十年来医疗保健领域信任研究综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):126-178. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12598. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
The relationship between trust and attitudes towards the COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app in the UK.英国民众对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用程序的信任与态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276661. eCollection 2022.
3
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.
理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
4
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Is the NHS overwhelmed?英国国家医疗服务体系不堪重负了吗?
BMJ. 2022 Jan 11;376:o51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o51.
6
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
7
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
8
Demographic Factors Influencing the Impact of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation on WhatsApp: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.影响 WhatsApp 上与冠状病毒相关错误信息影响的人口统计学因素:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 30;7(1):e19858. doi: 10.2196/19858.
9
The Impact of Trust and Risk Perception on the Acceptance of Measures to Reduce COVID-19 Cases.信任和风险感知对减少 COVID-19 病例措施接受度的影响。
Risk Anal. 2021 May;41(5):787-800. doi: 10.1111/risa.13675. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.