Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234638.
A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus were searched using specific terms. Most of the available data identified through the systematic literature review concerned entry screening measures at airports. Little evidence is available about entry and exit screening measure implementation and effectiveness at ports and ground crossings. Exit screening was part of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) temporary recommendations for implementation in certain points of entry, for specific time periods. Exit screening measures for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the three most affected West African countries did not identify any cases and showed zero sensitivity and very low specificity. The percentages of confirmed cases identified out of the total numbers of travelers that passed through entry screening measures in various countries worldwide for Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) and EVD in West Africa were zero or extremely low. Entry screening measures for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) did not detect any confirmed SARS cases in Australia, Canada, and Singapore. Despite the ineffectiveness of entry and exit screening measures, authors reported several important concomitant positive effects that their impact is difficult to assess, including discouraging travel of ill persons, raising awareness, and educating the traveling public and maintaining operation of flights from/to the affected areas. Exit screening measures in affected areas are important and should be applied jointly with other measures including information strategies, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing, vaccination, and quarantine to achieve a comprehensive outbreak management response. Based on review results, an algorithm about decision-making for entry/exit screening was developed.
进行了范围检索和系统文献回顾,通过分析过去 15 年全球范围内在入境点针对旅行者的入境和出境筛查实践、指南和经验方面的已有证据,深入了解入境和出境筛查。使用特定术语在灰色文献、PubMed 和 Scopus 中进行了检索。通过系统文献回顾确定的大部分现有数据涉及机场的入境筛查措施。关于港口和陆路口岸的入境和出境筛查措施的实施和效果,几乎没有证据。世界卫生组织(WHO)曾提出在某些入境点实施临时建议,作为特定时期的一部分,其中包括入境筛查措施。在受影响最严重的三个西非国家实施埃博拉病毒病(EVD)的出境筛查措施未发现任何病例,其灵敏度为零,特异性非常低。在全球各国针对流感大流行(H1N1)和西非 EVD 实施的入境筛查措施中,通过入境筛查措施的旅行者总数中确诊病例的比例为零或极低。澳大利亚、加拿大和新加坡针对严重急性呼吸系统综合征(SARS)的入境筛查措施未发现任何确诊 SARS 病例。尽管入境和出境筛查措施无效,但作者报告了一些重要的伴随积极影响,这些影响很难评估,包括劝阻患病旅行者出行、提高意识、教育旅行者和维持受影响地区的航班运营。在受影响地区实施出境筛查措施非常重要,应与其他措施联合应用,包括信息策略、流行病学调查、接触者追踪、疫苗接种和检疫,以实现全面的疫情管理应对。基于审查结果,制定了入境/出境筛查决策的算法。