Tervaniemi Mari, Just Viola, Koelsch Stefan, Widmann Andreas, Schröger Erich
Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Brain Research Centre, PO Box 9, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2044-5. Epub 2004 Nov 13.
Previously, professional violin players were found to automatically discriminate tiny pitch changes, not discriminable by nonmusicians. The present study addressed the pitch processing accuracy in musicians with expertise in playing a wide selection of instruments (e.g., piano; wind and string instruments). Of specific interest was whether also musicians with such divergent backgrounds have facilitated accuracy in automatic and/or attentive levels of auditory processing. Thirteen professional musicians and 13 nonmusicians were presented with frequent standard sounds and rare deviant sounds (0.8, 2, or 4% higher in frequency). Auditory event-related potentials evoked by these sounds were recorded while first the subjects read a self-chosen book and second they indicated behaviorally the detection of sounds with deviant frequency. Musicians detected the pitch changes faster and more accurately than nonmusicians. The N2b and P3 responses recorded during attentive listening had larger amplitude in musicians than in nonmusicians. Interestingly, the superiority in pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians over nonmusicians was observed not only with the 0.8% but also with the 2% frequency changes. Moreover, also nonmusicians detected quite reliably the smallest pitch changes of 0.8%. However, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a recorded during a reading condition did not differentiate musicians and nonmusicians. These results suggest that musical expertise may exert its effects merely at attentive levels of processing and not necessarily already at the preattentive levels.
此前研究发现,专业小提琴演奏者能够自动辨别微小的音高变化,而非音乐家则无法辨别。本研究探讨了在演奏多种乐器(如钢琴、管乐器和弦乐器)方面具有专业技能的音乐家的音高处理准确性。特别感兴趣的是,具有如此不同背景的音乐家在听觉处理的自动和/或注意力水平上是否也具有更高的准确性。研究人员向13名专业音乐家和13名非音乐家呈现频繁出现的标准声音和罕见的异常声音(频率高0.8%、2%或4%)。在受试者首先阅读自选书籍,其次通过行为表明检测到频率异常的声音时,记录这些声音诱发的听觉事件相关电位。音乐家比非音乐家更快、更准确地检测到音高变化。在注意力集中聆听过程中记录的N2b和P3反应,音乐家的波幅比非音乐家更大。有趣的是,不仅在频率变化0.8%时,而且在频率变化2%时,都观察到音乐家在音高辨别准确性上优于非音乐家。此外,非音乐家也能相当可靠地检测到最小0.8%的音高变化。然而,在阅读条件下记录的失配负波(MMN)和P3a并未区分音乐家和非音乐家。这些结果表明,音乐专业技能可能仅在注意力处理水平上发挥作用,而不一定在注意力前水平就发挥作用。