Cantrill Ruth M, Creedy Debra K, Cooke Marie
School of Nursing, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland.
Aust J Midwifery. 2003 Jun;16(2):11-6. doi: 10.1016/s1031-170x(03)80003-x.
Little is known about how midwives learn about breastfeeding. This study asked midwives to identify breastfeeding information resources used and perceived value for their learning. A mail questionnaire was sent to midwives (n = 3500) through the Australian College of Midwives Inc. (ACMI). A response rate of 31.6% (n = 1105) was obtained. On-the-job experience was the most common source accessed and continuing education the most valuable. Very few respondents (3.1% n = 34) acknowledged either their hospital or university midwifery education program as a valuable breastfeeding information source. There is scope for continuing education programs to address evidence-based lactation and infant feeding information. Midwifery curricula need to teach in-depth knowledge of human lactation and develop clinicians' skill base to assist breastfeeding women. The development of national standards for course accreditation on lactation and infant feeding by ACMI, Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and Australian Breastfeeding Association (ABA) would be a useful quality measure.
关于助产士如何学习母乳喂养的情况,人们了解甚少。本研究要求助产士识别所使用的母乳喂养信息资源以及这些资源对其学习的感知价值。通过澳大利亚助产士学院(ACMI)向3500名助产士发送了邮件调查问卷。获得了31.6%(n = 1105)的回复率。在职经验是最常获取信息的来源,而继续教育则是最具价值的。很少有受访者(3.1%,n = 34)认为他们所在医院或大学的助产士教育项目是有价值的母乳喂养信息来源。继续教育项目有空间来提供基于证据的泌乳和婴儿喂养信息。助产士课程需要教授人类泌乳的深入知识,并培养临床医生协助母乳喂养女性的技能基础。由ACMI、爱婴医院倡议组织(BFHI)和澳大利亚母乳喂养协会(ABA)制定泌乳和婴儿喂养课程认证的国家标准将是一项有益的质量衡量标准。