Tropine A, Vucurevic G, Delani P, Boor S, Hopf N, Bohl J, Stoeter P
Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Dec;20(6):905-12. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20217.
To determine if the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) can differentiate between accompanying edema and tumor cell infiltration of white matter (WM) beyond the tumor edge as defined from conventional MRI in low- and high-grade gliomas.
We examined 12 patients with high-grade gliomas/glioblastomas and eight patients with low-grade gliomas and compared them to 10 patients with meningiomas, in which no tumor infiltration is expected. The tumor was defined as the enhancing area in glioblastomas and meningiomas and as the area of increased T2-signal in low-grade gliomas. FA and MD were measured in the center of the tumor and in the adjacent WM. The contralateral WM and internal capsule were used as an internal standard.
Comparing the WM areas of increased T2-signal adjacent to meningiomas and glioblastomas, we saw a trend (without significance) towards a reduction of FA, but not of MD, in glioblastomas. We found no changes of FA and MD in the WM adjacent to low-grade gliomas (without T2-signal increase) compared to the WM of the contralateral hemisphere. In meningiomas and high-grade gliomas/glioblastomas, a narrow rim of significantly (P < 0.01) increased FA and decreased MD values around the enhancing tumor area was seen, whereas in low-grade gliomas, such a rim could not be defined. There was no contribution of FA or MD to grading of gliomas.
In glioblastomas, a reduction of FA in the edematous area surrounding the tumor may indicate tumor cell infiltration, but a reliable differentiation between infiltration and vasogenic edema is not yet possible on the basis of DTI. The additional finding of a narrow rim of increased FA and decreased MD at the edge of glioblastomas (as well as in meningiomas) may be caused by com-pressed WM fibers and/or increased vascularity, but does not contribute to exclude peripheral cellular infiltration.
确定扩散张量成像(DTI)参数分数各向异性(FA)和平均扩散率(MD)能否区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤中,常规MRI所定义的肿瘤边缘以外白质(WM)的伴随水肿和肿瘤细胞浸润。
我们检查了12例高级别胶质瘤/胶质母细胞瘤患者和8例低级别胶质瘤患者,并将他们与10例预计无肿瘤浸润的脑膜瘤患者进行比较。在胶质母细胞瘤和脑膜瘤中,肿瘤被定义为强化区域;在低级别胶质瘤中,肿瘤被定义为T2信号增强区域。在肿瘤中心和相邻的WM中测量FA和MD。对侧WM和内囊用作内标。
比较脑膜瘤和胶质母细胞瘤相邻的T2信号增强的WM区域,我们发现胶质母细胞瘤中FA有降低趋势(无统计学意义),但MD无降低趋势。与对侧半球的WM相比,我们发现低级别胶质瘤(T2信号无增加)相邻的WM中FA和MD无变化。在脑膜瘤和高级别胶质瘤/胶质母细胞瘤中,在强化肿瘤区域周围可见FA显著增加(P<0.01)和MD值降低的狭窄边缘,而在低级别胶质瘤中,无法定义这样的边缘。FA或MD对胶质瘤分级无贡献。
在胶质母细胞瘤中,肿瘤周围水肿区域FA的降低可能表明肿瘤细胞浸润,但基于DTI尚无法可靠区分浸润和血管源性水肿。胶质母细胞瘤边缘(以及脑膜瘤)出现FA增加和MD降低的狭窄边缘这一额外发现,可能是由受压的WM纤维和/或血管增多引起的,但无助于排除外周细胞浸润。