Fredum Hanne Gotaas, Rost Felicitas, Ulberg Randi, Midgley Nick, Thorén Agneta, Aker Julie Fredrikke Dalen, Johansen Hanna Fam, Sandvand Lena, Tosterud Lina, Dahl Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Portman Clinic, The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 22;12:708401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708401. eCollection 2021.
Research suggests that short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) is an effective treatment for depression in adolescence, yet treatment dropout is a major concern and what leads to dropout is poorly understood. Whilst studies have begun to explore the role of patient and therapist variables, there is a dearth of research on the actual therapy process and investigation of the interaction between patient and therapist. This study aims to address this paucity through the utilisation of the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-set (APQ) to examine the early treatment period. The sample includes 69 adolescents aged 16-18 years with major depressive disorder receiving STPP as part of the First Experimental Study of Transference Work-in Teenagers (FEST-IT) trial. Of these, 21 were identified as dropouts and were compared to completers on pre-treatment patient characteristics, symptomatology, functioning, and working alliance. APQ ratings available for an early session from 16 of these drop out cases were analysed to explore the patient-therapist interaction structure. Results from the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct interaction structures that explained 54.3% of the total variance. The first described a process of mutual trust and collaboration, the second was characterised by patient resistance and emotional detachment, the third by a mismatch and incongruence between therapist and adolescent. Comparison between the three revealed interesting differences which taken together provide further evidence that the reasons why adolescents drop out of therapy vary and are multidimensional in nature.
研究表明,短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)是治疗青少年抑郁症的一种有效方法,然而治疗脱落是一个主要问题,且导致脱落的原因却鲜为人知。虽然已有研究开始探讨患者和治疗师变量的作用,但对于实际治疗过程以及患者与治疗师之间互动的研究却很匮乏。本研究旨在通过运用青少年心理治疗Q分类表(APQ)来研究治疗初期,以解决这一不足。样本包括69名年龄在16至18岁、患有重度抑郁症且接受STPP治疗的青少年,这是青少年移情工作首次实验研究(FEST-IT)试验的一部分。其中,21名被确定为脱落者,并在治疗前的患者特征、症状、功能和工作联盟方面与完成治疗者进行比较。对其中16例脱落病例早期疗程的APQ评分进行分析,以探索患者与治疗师的互动结构。Q因素分析结果揭示了三种不同的互动结构,它们解释了总方差的54.3%。第一种描述了相互信任与合作的过程,第二种以患者的抵触和情感疏离为特征,第三种则是治疗师与青少年之间的不匹配和不一致。三者之间的比较揭示了有趣的差异,这些差异共同提供了进一步的证据,表明青少年退出治疗的原因各不相同且具有多维度性质。