Stoll Thomas, Huber Erika, Bachmann Stefan, Baumeler Hans-Ruedi, Mariacher Stefan, Rutz Martin, Schneider Werner, Spring Hans, Aeschlimann André, Stucki Gerold, Steiner Werner
Vereinigung der Rehabilitationskliniken der Schweiz, Schwiez, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 15;29(24):2851-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000147802.57484.77.
Study of two cohorts with a differing severity of disease before and after treatment.
The aim of this study was to examine the validity and sensitivity to change of the German version of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire.
To the authors' best knowledge, there are no data revealing the psychometric properties of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire.
The validity and sensitivity in patients with cervical spine disorders who were referred by their physician either to an inpatient rehabilitation program or to an outpatient physiotherapy were examined. They were consecutively recruited. Their functioning and health status were assessed when entering the study and after the treatment by the NASS questionnaire and the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36).
Criterion validity was demonstrated by the statistically significant correlations between the NASS subscores and all subscores of SF-36. As expected, the SF-36 subscores Physical Function and Pain showed the strongest associations to the NASS subscore Pain and Disability (rho = 0.75 and 0.65, respectively), demonstrating construct validity of the latter. Discriminative validity of NASS subscores was shown in two ways. First, a statistically significant difference was found between functional and health status of the two cohorts with better scores in the patients referred to outpatient physiotherapy as compared with those sent to an inpatient rehabilitation program. Second, statistically significant and clinically important improvements recorded by the NASS subscores were demonstrated in both patient groups after the treatment in accordance with improved SF-36 subscores. Moreover, the NASS subscores demonstrated good sensitivity to change (Pain and Disability with a standard response mean ranging from 0.64 to 1.24).
The German version of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire (NASS) is a valid instrument for patients with cervical spine health problems. As this instrument is also sensitive to change, it is recommended for use. Moreover, the present study gives evidence for the validity of the original cervical NASS questionnaire in English.
对两个疾病严重程度不同的队列在治疗前后进行研究。
本研究旨在检验德文版颈椎NASS患者问卷的效度及对变化的敏感性。
据作者所知,尚无数据揭示颈椎NASS患者问卷的心理测量特性。
对由医生转介至住院康复项目或门诊物理治疗的颈椎疾病患者的效度及敏感性进行了检验。他们是连续招募的。在进入研究时和治疗后,通过NASS问卷和医学结局调查简表-36(SF-36)对他们的功能和健康状况进行评估。
NASS子分数与SF-36的所有子分数之间具有统计学显著相关性,证明了效标效度。正如预期的那样,SF-36子分数“身体功能”和“疼痛”与NASS子分数“疼痛”和“残疾”的相关性最强(分别为rho = 0.75和0.65),证明了后者的结构效度。NASS子分数的区分效度通过两种方式得以体现。首先,发现两个队列的功能和健康状况存在统计学显著差异,与被送往住院康复项目的患者相比,被转介至门诊物理治疗的患者得分更高。其次,根据SF-36子分数的改善情况,两个患者组在治疗后NASS子分数均有统计学显著且具有临床意义的改善。此外,NASS子分数对变化具有良好的敏感性(“疼痛”和“残疾”的标准反应均值范围为0.64至1.24)。
德文版颈椎NASS患者问卷(NASS)对于有颈椎健康问题的患者是一种有效的工具。由于该工具对变化也敏感,因此推荐使用。此外,本研究为英文版原始颈椎NASS问卷的效度提供了证据。