Suppr超能文献

使用“经睑眼压计”TGDc - 01测量眼压并与压平眼压测量法进行比较。

Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.

作者信息

Sandner Dirk, Böhm Andreas, Kostov Sandra, Pillunat Lutz

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Dresden, Fetscher Strasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;243(6):563-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-1037-1. Epub 2004 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An irregular corneal surface compromises IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry. In such cases accurate measurement without corneal contact would be desirable. The new eyelid tonometer TGDc-01 measures IOP without corneal contact through the eyelid. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the eyelid tonometer compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry (cornea thickness-corrected values) in subjects without corneal alterations.

METHODS

IOP was measured in 199 eyes of 103 subjects without corneal alterations by means of two different methods. Measurements with the transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer were performed within 5 min in random order.

RESULTS

The mean difference between lid tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry was 0.71 mmHg, SD +/-2.467 mmHg. In the reliability analysis the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.8620. Compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry 66.4% of the IOP readings measured by lid tonometry were in an interval of +/-2 mmHg, 81.0% in an interval of +/-3 mmHg. The maximum of deviation was -6 mmHg and +6 mmHg, respectively. The Bland and Altman plots are shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Lid tonometry correlates sufficiently with Goldmann applanation tonometry, but in more than 10% of the measurements the IOP readings differed by more than 3 mmHg. The eyelid tonometer may be helpful as a screening tool when Goldmann applanation tonometry is not applicable.

摘要

背景

不规则角膜表面会影响Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压。在此类情况下,无需接触角膜的准确测量方法会很有必要。新型眼睑眼压计TGDc - 01可通过眼睑在不接触角膜的情况下测量眼压。本研究的目的是在无角膜病变的受试者中,评估该眼睑眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计(角膜厚度校正值)相比的准确性。

方法

采用两种不同方法对103例无角膜病变受试者的199只眼进行眼压测量。使用经睑眼压计TGDc - 01和Goldmann压平眼压计进行测量,测量顺序随机,两次测量间隔时间在5分钟内。

结果

眼睑眼压测量法与Goldmann压平眼压测量法之间的平均差值为0.71 mmHg,标准差为±2.467 mmHg。在可靠性分析中,组内相关系数为0.8620。与Goldmann压平眼压测量法相比,眼睑眼压测量法测得的眼压读数中,66.4%在±2 mmHg范围内,81.0%在±3 mmHg范围内。最大偏差分别为 - 6 mmHg和 + 6 mmHg。展示了Bland和Altman图。

结论

眼睑眼压测量法与Goldmann压平眼压测量法有足够的相关性,但在超过10%的测量中,眼压读数差异超过3 mmHg。当Goldmann压平眼压测量法不适用时,眼睑眼压计可作为一种筛查工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验