• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狼疮抗凝物的凝血检测:当前方法的综述与批判

Coagulation assays for the lupus anticoagulant: review and critique of current methodology.

作者信息

Triplett D A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

出版信息

Stroke. 1992 Feb;23(2 Suppl):I11-4.

PMID:1561667
Abstract

Several coagulation assays identify lupus anticoagulants, but there is no uniform opinion regarding minimum criteria for the diagnosis or the most sensitive procedure to be used to screen for lupus anticoagulants. Based on test availability and the cumulative literature, a sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time appears to be the most appropriate screening test. The dilute Russell's viper venom time may be used as both a screening and a confirmatory procedure. The platelet neutralization procedure is the most sensitive and specific of the confirmatory procedures that use an increased amount of phospholipid to either "bypass" or "neutralize" the lupus anticoagulant.

摘要

有几种凝血检测方法可识别狼疮抗凝物,但对于狼疮抗凝物诊断的最低标准或用于筛查狼疮抗凝物的最敏感检测方法,尚无统一意见。根据检测方法的可用性和累积文献,活化部分凝血活酶时间似乎是最合适的筛查检测。稀释蝰蛇毒时间可用作筛查和确证检测。血小板中和试验是确证检测中最敏感和特异的,这些确证检测使用增加量的磷脂来“绕过”或“中和”狼疮抗凝物。

相似文献

1
Coagulation assays for the lupus anticoagulant: review and critique of current methodology.狼疮抗凝物的凝血检测:当前方法的综述与批判
Stroke. 1992 Feb;23(2 Suppl):I11-4.
2
The activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies.活化部分凝血活酶时间狼疮抗凝物检测可检测出具有临床意义的抗体。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2008 Jul;14(3):332-7. doi: 10.1177/1076029607305099. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
3
Coagulation tests and anti-phospholipid antibodies in patients positive for lupus anticoagulant.狼疮抗凝物阳性患者的凝血试验和抗磷脂抗体
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2000 Jul;6(3):144-50. doi: 10.1177/107602960000600305.
4
Evaluation of four coagulation tests to detect plasma lupus anticoagulants.评估四种凝血试验以检测血浆狼疮抗凝物。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Dec;96(6):755-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/96.6.755.
5
Screening for the lupus anticoagulant.狼疮抗凝物筛查
Ric Clin Lab. 1989 Oct-Dec;19(4):379-89. doi: 10.1007/BF02871829.
6
Dilute Russell's viper venom and activated partial thromboplastin time in lupus anticoagulant diagnosis: is mixing essential?狼疮抗凝物诊断中稀释的锯鳞蝰蛇毒与活化部分凝血活酶时间:混合是否必要?
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016 Jun;27(4):408-11. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000463.
7
Detection of lupus anticoagulant by means of dilute Russell's viper venom time is affected by oral anticoagulant therapy.采用稀释蝰蛇毒时间检测狼疮抗凝物会受到口服抗凝治疗的影响。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1990 Dec;1(6):627-32.
8
Lupus anticoagulants: pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis.狼疮抗凝物:发病机制与实验室诊断
Br J Biomed Sci. 1997 Dec;54(4):287-98.
9
Evaluation of the phospholipid-rich dilute Russell's viper venom assay to monitor oral anticoagulation in patients with lupus anticoagulant.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2004 Jun;15(4):353-7. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200406000-00011.
10
Heterogeneity of Russell's viper venom affects the sensitivity of the dilute Russell's viper venom time to lupus anticoagulants.罗素蝰蛇毒液的异质性会影响稀释的罗素蝰蛇毒液时间对狼疮抗凝物的敏感性。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2004 Apr;15(3):279-82. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200404000-00015.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiphospholipid syndrome; its implication in cardiovascular diseases: a review.抗磷脂综合征;其在心血管疾病中的意义:综述
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Nov 3;5:101. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-101.
2
Antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征
J R Soc Med. 2002 Jul;95(7):336-42. doi: 10.1177/014107680209500705.
3
A case of cerebral infarction associated with positive antiphospholipid antibody in a systemic lupus patient.一名系统性红斑狼疮患者出现与抗磷脂抗体阳性相关的脑梗死病例。
Korean J Intern Med. 1994 Jan;9(1):43-6. doi: 10.3904/kjim.1994.9.1.43.
4
Lupus pregnancies and neonatal lupus.狼疮妊娠与新生儿狼疮。
Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1994;16(2-3):247-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00197520.