Drago Dorothy A
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):10-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0249.
The current study was undertaken to describe patterns of kitchen burns and scalds to young children to understand better why such injuries continue to occur despite intervention efforts.
Emergency department-treated thermal burns and scalds associated with nonelectric cookware were examined from a national sample, collected by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission's injury surveillance system over a 6-year period, 1997-2002. Data extracted from the cases included age, gender, body part, disposition, case weight, causal substance, and injury pattern. Data were analyzed using Epi Info 2002, with significance assessed by chi(2) test.
Scalds were approximately twice as common as were thermal burns. Hot water was the chief causal agent for scalds. The 2 most common scald injury patterns were (1) the child reached up and pulled a pot of hot water off the stove or other elevated surface and (2) the child grabbed, overturned, or spilled a container of hot water onto him- or herself. One-year-olds were at highest risk for scalds and thermal burns. Scalds resulted in significantly more hospitalizations than did thermal burns. In nearly all injury patterns, more boys than girls were injured, but the ratio varied depending on the injury pattern.
Although the kitchen is recognized as a room that is hazardous for young children, parents seem not to recognize or anticipate the risk for burns and scalds. The ability of children, especially toddlers, to reach containers of hot liquids on elevated surfaces is reflected in the injury data and is explained by anthropometry data, yet there is an apparent failure on the part of parents to recognize children's ability to gain access to the hazard and a failure to recognize the potential severity of resulting injury. These failures might explain why behavioral interventions (eg, place pots on back burners of stove) have been nonmotivating and ineffective. A multifaceted spectrum of prevention that has individual, community, and organizational components may prove to be more useful.
开展本研究以描述幼儿厨房烧伤和烫伤的模式,从而更好地理解为何尽管已采取干预措施,此类伤害仍持续发生。
对与非电炊具有关的急诊科治疗的热烧伤和烫伤进行检查,数据来自美国消费品安全委员会伤害监测系统在1997年至2002年6年期间收集的全国样本。从病例中提取的数据包括年龄、性别、身体部位、处置方式、病例权重、致伤物质和损伤模式。使用Epi Info 2002对数据进行分析,通过卡方检验评估显著性。
烫伤的发生率约为热烧伤的两倍。热水是烫伤的主要致伤因素。两种最常见的烫伤损伤模式为:(1)儿童伸手将一锅热水从炉灶或其他高处表面拉落;(2)儿童抓住、打翻或将一容器热水洒在自己身上。1岁幼儿发生烫伤和热烧伤的风险最高。烫伤导致的住院人数明显多于热烧伤。在几乎所有损伤模式中,受伤男孩多于女孩,但该比例因损伤模式而异。
尽管厨房被认为是对幼儿有危险的房间,但家长似乎并未认识到或预见到烧伤和烫伤的风险。幼儿,尤其是学步儿童够到高处表面上热液体容器的能力在损伤数据中有所体现,并可通过人体测量数据加以解释,但家长显然未能认识到儿童接触此类危险的能力,也未认识到由此导致伤害的潜在严重性。这些疏忽可能解释了为何行为干预措施(如将锅放在炉灶的后炉眼上)未能起到激励作用且效果不佳。一种包含个人、社区和组织层面的多方面预防措施可能会更有用。