Sanders J, Jackson D M, Starmer G A
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Mar 28;61(3):281-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00432273.
The ability of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), cannabidiol (CBD), 11-OH THC and 8 alpha, 11-diOH THC to antagonise the abdominal constriction response in the mouse induced by formic acid, phenylquinone, 5-hydroxytryptamine, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and bradykinin was tested. THC was an effective antagonist against all nociceptive agents with an ED50 in all cases between 1.0 and 2.6 mg/kg. CBN, while also effective against all nociceptive agents, was less potent than THC, with an ED50 range between 46.2 and 112.5 mg/kg. CBD in doses as high as 200 mg/kg was without effect. Using PGE1 as the nociceptive agent, 11-OH THC was equipotent to THC while 8 alpha, 11-diOH THC was inactive. Naloxone, while able to antagonise the antinociceptive effect of morphine against formic acid-induced writhing, did not reverse the antinociceptive effects of THC. There were no pharmacological interactions between THC, CBD and CBN.
测试了δ9-四氢大麻酚(THC)、大麻酚(CBN)、大麻二酚(CBD)、11-羟基THC和8α,11-二羟基THC拮抗甲酸、苯醌、5-羟色胺、前列腺素E1(PGE1)和缓激肽诱导的小鼠腹部收缩反应的能力。THC是所有伤害性刺激剂的有效拮抗剂,在所有情况下ED50均在1.0至2.6mg/kg之间。CBN虽然对所有伤害性刺激剂也有效,但其效力低于THC,ED50范围在46.2至112.5mg/kg之间。高达200mg/kg剂量的CBD无效。以PGE1作为伤害性刺激剂时,11-羟基THC与THC等效,而8α,11-二羟基THC无活性。纳洛酮虽然能够拮抗吗啡对甲酸诱导扭体反应的镇痛作用,但不能逆转THC的镇痛作用。THC、CBD和CBN之间没有药理相互作用。