Suppr超能文献

对患有腰伤的非裔美国人和白人工伤赔偿申请人的疼痛灾难化量表进行验证性因素分析。

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in African American and Caucasian Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries.

作者信息

Chibnall John T, Tait Raymond C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1221 South Grand Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63108, USA.

出版信息

Pain. 2005 Feb;113(3):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.016.

Abstract

Pain catastrophizing is an important cognitive construct that has been linked with many aspects of the pain experience, including pain intensity, emotional distress, pain-related disability, and pain behavior. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), an instrument often used to assess this construct, reflects three aspects of catastrophizing: Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness. Its factor structure, however, has never been examined in clinical samples of persons with occupational injury or as a function of race. In this study, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the PCS in a large, racially diverse sample of Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries. Results indicated that a two-factor model of the PCS (Rumination and 'Powerlessness,' the latter a combination of the PCS Magnification and Helplessness scores) was the most parsimonious fit to the data, particularly in the African American sample. Future research in other clinical samples that include African Americans is needed to examine the stability of the results reported here.

摘要

疼痛灾难化是一种重要的认知结构,它与疼痛体验的许多方面相关联,包括疼痛强度、情绪困扰、与疼痛相关的残疾以及疼痛行为。疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)是一种常用于评估这一结构的工具,它反映了灾难化的三个方面:沉思、放大和无助。然而,其因子结构从未在职业伤害患者的临床样本中进行过研究,也未作为种族的函数进行过研究。在本研究中,探索性和验证性因子分析被用于检验PCS在一个大型的、种族多样化的患有腰伤的工人赔偿 claimants 样本中的因子结构。结果表明,PCS的两因子模型(沉思和“无力感”,后者是PCS放大分数和无助分数的组合)对数据的拟合最为简约,尤其是在非裔美国人样本中。需要在其他包括非裔美国人的临床样本中进行未来研究,以检验此处报告结果的稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验