Galambos Attila, Stoll Dániel Péter, Bolczár Szabolcs, Lazáry Áron, Urbán Róbert, Kökönyei Gyöngyi
Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Izabella Street 46, H-1064, Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Izabella Street 46, H-1064, Budapest, Hungary.
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 20;7(9):e08026. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08026. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated cognitive-affective response to actual or anticipated pain, usually measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Our study aimed to test the bifactor measurement model of the Hungarian PCS and to identify a catastrophizing risk group with a clinically meaningful cut-off score. The data of 404 chronic spine-related (neck, back and low-back) pain patients (mean age: 58.61 (SD = 14.34)) were used in our cross-sectional study. Besides pain-related and demographic data, pain catastrophizing and depressive symptoms were measured with questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that the bifactor model outperformed the other tested measurement models, and the general catastrophizing factor was responsible for 81.5% of the explained variance. Using latent class analysis, we found that even moderately elevated pain catastrophizing score was related to more depressive symptoms and higher perceived pain intensity, and 22 score could be used as a cut-off score. Our results support the concept of global pain catastrophizing and the validity of the Hungarian PCS. Further studies are needed to evaluate the bifactor structure of this scale and the predictive value of the proposed cut-off score.
疼痛灾难化是对实际或预期疼痛的一种夸张的认知情感反应,通常用疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)来衡量。我们的研究旨在测试匈牙利版PCS的双因素测量模型,并确定一个具有临床意义的临界分数的灾难化风险组。我们的横断面研究使用了404名慢性脊柱相关(颈部、背部和下背部)疼痛患者的数据(平均年龄:58.61岁(标准差=14.34))。除了疼痛相关和人口统计学数据外,还通过问卷对疼痛灾难化和抑郁症状进行了测量。验证性因素分析证实,双因素模型优于其他测试的测量模型,总体灾难化因素占解释方差的81.5%。通过潜在类别分析,我们发现即使是中度升高的疼痛灾难化分数也与更多的抑郁症状和更高的疼痛强度感知有关,22分可以用作临界分数。我们的结果支持全球疼痛灾难化的概念以及匈牙利版PCS的有效性。需要进一步研究来评估该量表的双因素结构和所提议临界分数的预测价值。