• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募雇佣多民族、低薪劳动力的小型制造企业工作场所参与癌症预防研究试验。

Recruiting small manufacturing worksites that employ multiethnic, low-wage workforces into a cancer prevention research trial.

作者信息

Barbeau Elizabeth M, Wallace Lorraine, Lederman Ruth, Lightman Nancy, Stoddard Anne, Sorensen Glorian

机构信息

Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jul;1(3):A04. Epub 2004 Jun 15.

PMID:15670425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1253469/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Worksites, including those that employ multiethnic, low-wage workforces, represent a strategic venue for reaching populations at risk for developing cancer.

METHODS

We surveyed 197 small manufacturing worksites prior to an effort to recruit their workforces into a randomized clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of a cancer prevention intervention among multiethnic, low-wage manufacturing workers. This paper assesses the external validity of the trial based on three factors: the percentage of potential trial sites excluded from consideration, the percentage of eligible worksites that adopted the trial, and worksite characteristics associated with adoption.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences between worksites that adopted the trial and worksites that declined the trial with regard to employee demographics, anticipated changes in workforce size, and perceived importance and history of offering health promotion and occupational health and safety activities.

CONCLUSION

Small manufacturing worksites present a viable venue for reaching multiethnic, low-wage populations with cancer prevention programs, although program adoption rates may be low in this sector. Worksites that adopted the trial are likely to represent worksites deemed eligible for the trial.

摘要

引言

工作场所,包括那些雇佣多民族、低薪劳动力的场所,是接触有患癌风险人群的一个战略场所。

方法

在努力招募其劳动力参加一项随机临床试验之前,我们对197个小型制造工作场所进行了调查,该试验旨在测试一项癌症预防干预措施对多民族、低薪制造业工人的有效性。本文基于三个因素评估该试验的外部效度:被排除在考虑范围之外的潜在试验场所的百分比、采用该试验的合格工作场所的百分比,以及与采用相关的工作场所特征。

结果

在员工人口统计学特征、劳动力规模的预期变化以及对提供健康促进和职业健康与安全活动的重要性认知和历史方面,采用该试验的工作场所与拒绝该试验的工作场所之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

小型制造工作场所是为多民族、低薪人群开展癌症预防项目的一个可行场所,尽管该部门的项目采用率可能较低。采用该试验的工作场所可能代表被认为符合试验条件的工作场所。

相似文献

1
Recruiting small manufacturing worksites that employ multiethnic, low-wage workforces into a cancer prevention research trial.招募雇佣多民族、低薪劳动力的小型制造企业工作场所参与癌症预防研究试验。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jul;1(3):A04. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
2
Comparing Strategies for Recruiting Small, Low-Wage Worksites for Community-Based Health Promotion Research.比较社区健康促进研究中小规模、低薪工作场所的招募策略。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):690-696. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769360. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Worksite characteristics and changes in worksite tobacco-control initiatives. Results from the COMMIT study.工作场所特征及工作场所控烟举措的变化。COMMIT研究结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jun;39(6):520-6. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199706000-00006.
4
Experiences recruiting Indian worksites for an integrated health protection and health promotion randomized control trial in Maharashtra, India.在印度马哈拉施特拉邦为一项综合健康保护与健康促进随机对照试验招募印度工作场所的经验。
Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):412-21. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv010. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
5
Characteristics of participants in a cancer prevention intervention designed for multiethnic workers in small manufacturing worksites.针对小型制造企业多民族工人设计的癌症预防干预措施参与者的特征。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):33-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.33.
6
Self-insurance and worksite alcohol programs: an econometric analysis.自我保险与工作场所酒精项目:一项计量经济学分析
J Stud Alcohol. 1997 Mar;58(2):211-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.211.
7
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions in Small, Low-Wage Worksites: A Randomized Controlled Trial in King County, Washington (2014-2017).在小型低薪工作场所中推广基于证据的干预措施:华盛顿金县的一项随机对照试验(2014-2017 年)。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1739-1746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305313. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trial (United States).一项全面的工作场所癌症预防干预措施:一项随机对照试验(美国)的行为改变结果
J Public Health Policy. 2003;24(1):5-25.
9
The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.下一步试验:工作场所结直肠癌筛查促进项目的影响
Prev Med. 1999 Mar;28(3):276-83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0427.
10
Recruiting worksites to participate in a health promotion research study.招募工作场所参与一项健康促进研究。
Am J Health Promot. 1997 May-Jun;11(5):344-51. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.5.344.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Strategies for Recruiting Small, Low-Wage Worksites for Community-Based Health Promotion Research.比较社区健康促进研究中小规模、低薪工作场所的招募策略。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):690-696. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769360. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Community Interagency Connections for Immigrant Worker Health Interventions, King County, Washington State, 2012-2013.华盛顿州金县移民工人健康干预社区跨部门合作,2012 - 2013年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 2;13:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160013.
3
Creating a Representative Sample of Small Manufacturing Businesses for an Integrated Workplace Safety and Smoking Cessation Intervention Study.为一项综合工作场所安全与戒烟干预研究创建小型制造企业代表性样本。
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Jul;57(7):772-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000450.
4
Field experiment of a very brief worksite intervention to improve nutrition among health care workers.一项旨在改善医护人员营养状况的极简短工作场所干预措施的现场试验。
J Behav Med. 2015 Aug;38(4):599-608. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9634-5. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Experiences recruiting Indian worksites for an integrated health protection and health promotion randomized control trial in Maharashtra, India.在印度马哈拉施特拉邦为一项综合健康保护与健康促进随机对照试验招募印度工作场所的经验。
Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):412-21. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv010. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
6
Effectiveness of a worksite-based weight loss randomized controlled trial: the worksite study.基于工作场所的减肥随机对照试验的效果:工作场所研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Apr;23(4):737-45. doi: 10.1002/oby.20899. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Sociodemographic and social contextual predictors of multiple health behavior change: data from the Healthy Directions-Small Business study.社会人口学和社会背景因素对多种健康行为改变的预测作用:来自“健康之路-小企业研究”的数据。
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Mar;3(1):131-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0196-1.
8
Recruitment for Occupational Research: Using Injured Workers as the Point of Entry into Workplaces.职业研究的招募:以受伤工人作为进入工作场所的切入点
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e68354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068354. Print 2013.
9
Comparing strategies to assess multiple behavior change in behavioral intervention studies.比较行为干预研究中评估多种行为改变的策略。
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Mar 1;3(1):114-121. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0195-2. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
An Evaluation of Multiple Behavioral Risk Factors for Cancer in a Working Class, Multi-Ethnic Population.对工人阶级多民族人群中多种癌症行为危险因素的评估。
J Data Sci. 2006 Jul 1;4(3):291-306.

本文引用的文献

1
Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000.工人阶级问题:2000年国家健康访谈调查中的社会经济劣势、种族/民族、性别与吸烟情况
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):269-78. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.269.
2
Work site health promotion research: to what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?工作场所健康促进研究:我们能在多大程度上推广研究结果,以及将研究转化为实践需要什么?
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Oct;30(5):537-49. doi: 10.1177/1090198103254340.
3
A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trial (United States).一项综合性工作场所癌症预防干预措施:一项随机对照试验(美国)的行为改变结果
Cancer Causes Control. 2002 Aug;13(6):493-502. doi: 10.1023/a:1016385001695.
4
Health promotion trials at worksites and risk factors for cancer.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Jun;28(3):141-57. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.658.
5
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
6
Worksite and family education for dietary change: the Treatwell 5-a-Day program.通过工作场所和家庭教育改变饮食习惯:“每日五蔬果”健康促进计划。
Health Educ Res. 1998 Dec;13(4):577-91. doi: 10.1093/her/13.4.577.
7
Worksite health promotion programs in the U.S.: factors associated with availability and participation.美国的工作场所健康促进项目:与可及性和参与度相关的因素
Am J Health Promot. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(1):36-45. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.1.36.
8
A worksite smoking intervention: a 2 year assessment of groups, incentives and self-help.一项工作场所吸烟干预措施:对群体、激励措施和自助的两年评估。
Health Educ Res. 1997 Mar;12(1):129-38. doi: 10.1093/her/12.1.129.
9
Double jeopardy: workplace hazards and behavioral risks for craftspersons and laborers.双重风险:手工艺人和劳动者面临的工作场所危害与行为风险。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 May-Jun;10(5):355-63. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.5.355.
10
A model for worksite cancer prevention: integration of health protection and health promotion in the WellWorks Project.一个工作场所癌症预防模型:在“健康工作项目”中将健康保护与健康促进相结合。
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Sep-Oct;10(1):55-62. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.1.55.