Asseray Nathalie, Jacqueline Cedric, Le Mabecque Virginie, Batard Eric, Bugnon Denis, Potel Gilles, Caillon Jocelyne
Laboratoire Antibiologie, UPRES EA 3826, Faculté de Médecine, 1 rue Gaston Veil, 44035 Nantes, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Feb;49(2):857-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.857-859.2005.
The in vivo efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin against five Staphylococcus aureus strains with different susceptibilities to them and methicillin was studied. Rabbits were allocated at random to groups for endocarditis induction with one of these five strains and then treated for 2 days with vancomycin or teicoplanin. Each treated group was compared with a control group infected with the same strain. Vancomycin and teicoplanin showed similar activities. Low MICs did not predict better in vivo results.
研究了万古霉素和替考拉宁对五株对它们及甲氧西林敏感性不同的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的体内疗效。将兔子随机分配到用这五种菌株之一诱导心内膜炎的组中,然后用万古霉素或替考拉宁治疗2天。将每个治疗组与感染相同菌株的对照组进行比较。万古霉素和替考拉宁显示出相似的活性。低最低抑菌浓度并不能预测更好的体内结果。