Mills Peter R
Vielife Ltd, 72-76 Borough High Street, London, SE1 1XF, UK.
Environ Health. 2005 Jan 28;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-1.
There is a growing body of evidence linking health and well-being to key business issues. Despite this, corporate uptake of workplace health promotion programmes has been slow outside the USA. One possible reason for this is the lack of a generally available health risk measure that is quick and easy to administer and produces data that is rich enough to inform and direct subsequent employee health promotional interventions.
We report on the development and validation of the health and well-being (HWB) assessment, a free to use health risk appraisal questionnaire that has been specifically developed for use in the corporate setting. The HWB assessment focuses upon modifiable health issues that directly impact upon business drivers. Development involved interviews with business leaders to ascertain their key areas of focus, scientific and general literature review to find evidence for health status having an impact upon these areas, and end user testing.Three UK-based organisations (insurance, telecommunications and consumer goods sectors) participated in the research. A total of 2224 employees completed the HWB assessment, the short-form 36 (SF-36) and the World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) as part of the validation process.
The HWB assessment is a twenty item questionnaire covering ten areas of health and well-being. Completion of the HWB assessment generates a global health risk score and ten sub-scores corresponding to the ten areas covered. It is easy to use and quick to complete (average completion time was eight minutes) and showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Statistically significant correlations with similar SF-36 variables were observed. A significant negative correlation between HWB score and productivity decrement, as measured by the WHO-HPQ, was observed (r = -0.4). Individuals with HWB scores above the 25th percentile were more likely to achieve workplace productivity standards than those with scores below the 25th percentile (OR 3.62, 95% confidence limits 2.93 - 4.47).
The HWB assessment generates reliable business focused health risk data that can be used to direct and target appropriate interventions within corporate populations. It may also be useful in quantifying the financial impact health status issues have upon organisations.
越来越多的证据表明健康与幸福和关键业务问题之间存在联系。尽管如此,在美国以外的地区,企业对职场健康促进项目的采用一直很缓慢。造成这种情况的一个可能原因是缺乏一种普遍可用的健康风险衡量方法,这种方法要快速、易于实施,并且能产生足够丰富的数据,为后续的员工健康促进干预提供信息并指导干预方向。
我们报告了健康与幸福(HWB)评估的开发与验证情况,这是一份免费使用的健康风险评估问卷,专门为企业环境设计。HWB评估聚焦于直接影响业务驱动因素的可改变的健康问题。开发过程包括与企业领导者进行访谈,以确定他们的关键关注领域;进行科学和一般文献综述,以寻找健康状况对这些领域产生影响的证据;以及进行最终用户测试。三个英国组织(保险、电信和消费品行业)参与了这项研究。共有2224名员工完成了HWB评估、简短健康调查问卷36项版本(SF - 36)和世界卫生组织健康与工作绩效问卷(WHO - HPQ),作为验证过程的一部分。
HWB评估是一份包含20个条目的问卷,涵盖健康与幸福的十个领域。完成HWB评估会生成一个全球健康风险分数以及与所涵盖的十个领域相对应的十个子分数。它易于使用且完成速度快(平均完成时间为8分钟),并显示出良好的内部一致性和重测信度。观察到与类似的SF - 36变量存在统计学上的显著相关性。观察到HWB分数与WHO - HPQ所衡量的生产力下降之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.4)。HWB分数高于第25百分位数的个体比分数低于第25百分位数的个体更有可能达到职场生产力标准(优势比3.62,95%置信区间2.93 - 4.47)。
HWB评估生成了可靠的、以业务为重点的健康风险数据,可用于指导和针对企业人群进行适当的干预。它在量化健康状况问题对组织的财务影响方面可能也很有用。