Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences, Street 222 #55-37, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.
Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education, National Pedagogical University, Street 7 #11-86, Bogotá 480100, Colombia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116756.
The purpose of this study was to determine the mean propulsive velocity (MVP) at various percentages of one repetition maximum (1RM) in the full squat and chest press exercises. A total of 96 young women and 256 young men (recreational athletes) performed an incremental test (50−60−70−80% 1RM) comprising the bench press and full squat exercises in two different sessions. The individual load and velocity ratios were established through the MPV. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 25.0, with the significance level set at 5%. The following findings were revealed: highly linear load-velocity relationships in the group of women (r = 0.806 in the squat, and r = 0.872 in the bench press) and in the group of men (r = 0.832 and r = 0.880, respectively); significant differences (p < 0.001) in the MPV at 50−70−80% 1RM between the bench press and the full squat in men and at 70−80% 1RM in women; and a high variability in the MPV (11.49% to 22.63) in the bench press and full squat (11.58% to 25.15%) was observed in women and men (11.31% to 21.06%, and 9.26% to 24.2%) at the different percentages of 1RM evaluated. These results suggest that the load-velocity ratio in non-strength-trained subjects should be determined individually to more precisely establish the relative load to be used in a full squat and bench press training program.
本研究旨在确定在全蹲和卧推练习中,不同 1RM 百分比下的平均推进速度(MVP)。共有 96 名年轻女性和 256 名年轻男性(业余运动员)在两个不同的训练阶段进行了递增测试(50-60-70-80% 1RM),包括卧推和全蹲练习。通过 MVP 确定个体负荷和速度比。使用 SPSS 软件版本 25.0 分析数据,显著性水平设为 5%。得出以下发现:女性组(全蹲为 r = 0.806,卧推为 r = 0.872)和男性组(分别为 r = 0.832 和 r = 0.880)的负荷-速度关系高度线性;男性的卧推和全蹲在 50-70-80% 1RM 之间,女性在 70-80% 1RM 之间的 MVP 存在显著差异(p < 0.001);女性和男性在卧推和全蹲中的 MVP 变化较大(11.49%-22.63%)(11.58%-25.15%),在不同的 1RM 百分比下(11.31%-21.06%,9.26%-24.2%)。这些结果表明,非力量训练受试者的负荷-速度比应单独确定,以更准确地确定用于全蹲和卧推训练计划的相对负荷。