Appelhof Bente C, Fliers Eric, Wekking Ellie M, Schene Aart H, Huyser Jochanan, Tijssen Jan G P, Endert Erik, van Weert Henk C P M, Wiersinga Wilmar M
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, F5-161, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 May;90(5):2666-74. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2111. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
Controversy remains about the value of combined treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3), compared with LT4 alone in primary hypothyroidism. We compared combined treatment with LT4 and LT3 in a ratio of 5:1 or 10:1 with LT4 monotherapy. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 141 patients (18-70 yr old) with primary autoimmune hypothyroidism, recruited via general practitioners. Inclusion criteria included: LT4 treatment for 6 months or more, a stable dose for 6 wk or more, and serum TSH levels between 0.11 and 4.0 microU/ml (mU/liter). Randomization groups were: 1) continuation of LT4 (n = 48); 2) LT4/LT3, ratio 10:1 (n = 46); and 3) LT4/LT3, ratio 5:1 (n = 47). Subjective preference of study medication after 15 wk, compared with usual LT4, was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included scores on questionnaires on mood, fatigue, psychological symptoms, and a substantial set of neurocognitive tests. Study medication was preferred to usual treatment by 29.2, 41.3, and 52.2% in the LT4, 10:1 ratio, and 5:1 ratio groups, respectively (chi2 test for trend, P = 0.024). This linear trend was not substantiated by results on any of the secondary outcome measures: scores on questionnaires and neurocognitive tests consistently ameliorated, but the amelioration was not different among the treatment groups. Median end point serum TSH was 0.64 microU/ml (mU/liter), 0.35 microU/ml (mU/liter), and 0.07 microU/ml (mU/liter), respectively [ANOVA on ln(TSH) for linear trend, P < 0.01]. Mean body weight change was +0.1, -0.5, and -1.7 kg, respectively (ANOVA for trend, P = 0.01). Decrease in weight, but not decrease in serum TSH was correlated with increased satisfaction with study medication. Of the patients who preferred combined LT4/LT3 therapy, 44% had serum TSH less than 0.11 microU/ml (mU/liter). Patients preferred combined LT4/LT3 therapy to usual LT4 therapy, but changes in mood, fatigue, well-being, and neurocognitive functions could not satisfactorily explain why the primary outcome was in favor of LT4/LT3 combination therapy. Decrease in body weight was associated with satisfaction with study medication.
与单独使用左甲状腺素(LT4)相比,左甲状腺素(LT4)与碘塞罗宁(LT3)联合治疗原发性甲状腺功能减退症的价值仍存在争议。我们比较了LT4与LT3按5:1或10:1比例联合治疗与LT4单药治疗的效果。我们对141例(18 - 70岁)通过全科医生招募的原发性自身免疫性甲状腺功能减退症患者进行了一项双盲、随机、对照试验。纳入标准包括:接受LT4治疗6个月或更长时间,稳定剂量6周或更长时间,血清促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平在0.11至4.0微单位/毫升(mU/升)之间。随机分组如下:1)继续使用LT4(n = 48);2)LT4/LT3,比例为10:1(n = 46);3)LT4/LT3,比例为5:1(n = 47)。主要结局指标是15周后与常规LT4相比,对研究药物的主观偏好。次要结局包括情绪、疲劳、心理症状问卷得分以及一系列神经认知测试。在LT4组、10:1比例组和5:1比例组中,分别有29.2%、41.3%和52.2%的患者更喜欢研究药物而非常规治疗(趋势卡方检验,P = 0.024)。这种线性趋势在任何次要结局指标的结果中均未得到证实:问卷得分和神经认知测试结果均持续改善,但各治疗组之间的改善情况并无差异。终点血清TSH中位数分别为0.64微单位/毫升(mU/升)、0.35微单位/毫升(mU/升)和0.07微单位/毫升(mU/升)[对ln(TSH)进行线性趋势的方差分析,P < 0.01]。平均体重变化分别为+0.1千克、 - 0.5千克和 - 1.7千克(趋势方差分析,P = 0.01)。体重减轻与对研究药物的满意度增加相关,但血清TSH降低与满意度无关。在更喜欢LT4/LT3联合治疗的患者中,44%的患者血清TSH低于0.11微单位/毫升(mU/升)。患者更喜欢LT4/LT3联合治疗而非常规LT4治疗,但情绪、疲劳、幸福感和神经认知功能的变化无法令人满意地解释为何主要结局有利于LT4/LT3联合治疗。体重减轻与对研究药物的满意度相关。