Katz A R, Morens D M
Section of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822.
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jan;14(1):298-307. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.1.298.
The recent unexplained increase in severe streptococcal diseases in the United States and Great Britain is compared to the 1825-1885 pandemic of fatal scarlet fever. Although scarlet fever may not be representative of all severe streptococcal disease, it was the only one reliably identified in the 19th century. The epidemiology of scarlet fever during the 19th century pandemic suggests the following features of the disease; cocirculation of both virulent and less-virulent streptococcal strains eliciting cross-immunity; circulation of hyperendemic prevalent strains in urban centers of developed nations, with periodic spillovers to rural areas and developing nations; and protection of infants from infection (but not from fatal disease once infection occurred) by the transfer of maternal antibodies via the placenta, breast milk, or both. The 19th century data suggest that efforts to prevent severe streptococcal diseases should begin with better characterization of the epidemiology of streptococcal disease, a task entailing identification of streptococcal virulence factors and measurement of their distribution among isolates from individuals with streptococcal diseases and in open populations.
美国和英国近期出现的不明原因严重链球菌疾病增加情况,与1825年至1885年致命性猩红热大流行进行了比较。尽管猩红热可能并不代表所有严重链球菌疾病,但它是19世纪唯一能可靠识别的疾病。19世纪大流行期间猩红热的流行病学显示出该疾病的以下特征:毒性强和毒性较弱的链球菌菌株共同传播引发交叉免疫;高流行菌株在发达国家城市中心传播,定期蔓延至农村地区和发展中国家;婴儿通过胎盘、母乳或两者获得母体抗体而受到感染保护(但一旦感染,无法预防致命疾病)。19世纪的数据表明,预防严重链球菌疾病的努力应始于更好地描述链球菌疾病的流行病学特征,这项任务需要识别链球菌毒力因子,并测量其在链球菌疾病患者分离株及开放人群中的分布情况。