Dauwe Tom, Jaspers Veerle, Covaci Adrian, Schepens Paul, Eens Marcel
Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Feb;24(2):442-9. doi: 10.1897/03-596.1.
Keratinous tissues of mammals and humans, such as hair, have been used to determine the exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides. In the present study, we investigated the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs; PCBs, p,p'-DDT, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane [DDD], p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene [DDE], hexachlorobenzene [HCB], oxychlordane, trans-nonachlor, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and polybrominated biphenyls [PBBs]) in feathers of the great tit (Parus major). The accumulation of POPs in feathers and fat samples of 27 adult great tits collected in April 2000 and December 2002 was compared with regard to possible temporal and spatial differences. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers, PBBs, trans-nonachlor, and HCB could not be quantified in feathers. Most PCB congeners and DDTs (p,p'-DDE, p,p'-DDD, and p,p'-DDT) could be determined in feathers, although concentrations in feathers were markedly lower (sigmaPCB concentration range, 28.2-87.1 ng/g) than concentrations in fat (sigmaPCB concentration range, 1244-10074 ng/g). Feathers had relatively higher levels of low-chlorinated PCBs (tetra- and pentachlorinated biphenyls) and p,p'-DDD compared to levels in fat, presumably reflecting levels in blood. Persistent organic pollutant concentrations did not increase with the age of the feather, suggesting that exogenous or aerial depositions of POPs onto the feather surface had no, or only minimal, influence on levels in feathers. For almost all compounds studied, POPs in feathers and fat were significantly positively correlated in samples collected during the breeding season but not in samples collected during the winter. This temporal difference may have been caused by seasonal changes in lipid reserves. Although further research is required, feathers appear to be a promising new, nondestructive biomonitor for PCBs and DDTs in avian wildlife.
哺乳动物和人类的角质组织,如毛发,已被用于确定多氯联苯(PCBs)和有机氯农药的暴露情况。在本研究中,我们调查了大山雀(Parus major)羽毛中持久性有机污染物(POPs;多氯联苯、p,p'-滴滴涕、p,p'-二氯二苯二氯乙烷[DDD]、p,p'-二氯二苯二氯乙烯[DDE]、六氯苯[HCB]、氧氯丹、反式九氯、多溴二苯醚和多溴联苯[PBBs])的积累情况。比较了2000年4月和2002年12月收集的27只成年大山雀羽毛和脂肪样本中持久性有机污染物的积累情况,以探讨可能存在的时间和空间差异。羽毛中无法对多溴二苯醚、多溴联苯、反式九氯和六氯苯进行定量分析。尽管羽毛中的浓度(多氯联苯浓度范围为28.2 - 87.1 ng/g)明显低于脂肪中的浓度(多氯联苯浓度范围为1244 - 10074 ng/g),但大多数多氯联苯同系物和滴滴涕(p,p'-DDE、p,p'-DDD和p,p'-DDT)在羽毛中仍可检测到。与脂肪中的水平相比,羽毛中低氯代多氯联苯(四氯和五氯联苯)和p,p'-DDD的含量相对较高,这可能反映了血液中的水平。持久性有机污染物的浓度并未随着羽毛年龄的增加而升高,这表明持久性有机污染物通过外源或空气沉积到羽毛表面对羽毛中的含量没有影响,或影响极小。对于几乎所有研究的化合物,在繁殖季节采集的样本中,羽毛和脂肪中的持久性有机污染物呈显著正相关,但在冬季采集的样本中并非如此。这种时间差异可能是由脂质储备的季节性变化引起的。尽管还需要进一步研究,但羽毛似乎是一种有前景的新型非破坏性生物监测指标,可用于监测鸟类野生动物中的多氯联苯和滴滴涕。