Friesen Lendra M, Shannon Robert V, Cruz Rachel J
House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
Audiol Neurootol. 2005 May-Jun;10(3):169-84. doi: 10.1159/000084027. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
Phoneme and speech recognition were measured as a function of stimulation pulse rate in 12 listeners with three types of cochlear implants. Identification of consonants and vowels and recognition of words and sentences were measured in 5 Clarion C1 subjects fit with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processors having 4 or 8 electrodes, 4 Nucleus 24 subjects fit with CIS processors having 4, 8, 12 or 16 electrodes and 3 Clarion C2 subjects fit with CIS processors with 4, 8, 12 and 16 electrodes. Stimulation rates ranged from 200 to more than 5000 Hz per electrode, depending on the device, number of electrodes used and stimulation strategy. Listeners were also tested on the same materials with their original processor prior to receiving the experimental processors. All testing was done in quiet listening conditions with essentially no practice with the experimental processor prior to data collection. Listeners scored the highest with their original processor. Little difference in speech understanding was observed for listener scores with processors using different stimulation rates. Speech recognition was significantly poorer only at the lowest stimulation rate and at high rates that used noninterleaved pulses. Speech recognition was similar for processors using 8, 12 or 16 electrodes. Only 4-electrode processors produced a significantly poorer performance. These results suggest that patients with present commercial implants are not able to make full use of the number of channels of spectral information delivered by the present speech processors. In addition, the results show no significant change in performance as a function of stimulation rate, suggesting that high stimulation rates do not result in improved access to temporal cues in speech, at least under quiet listening conditions.
在12名佩戴三种类型人工耳蜗的受试者中,研究了音素和语音识别作为刺激脉冲率的函数关系。对5名佩戴具有4个或8个电极的连续交错采样(CIS)处理器的Clarion C1受试者、4名佩戴具有4、8、12或16个电极的CIS处理器的Nucleus 24受试者以及3名佩戴具有4、8、12和16个电极的CIS处理器的Clarion C2受试者进行了辅音和元音识别以及单词和句子识别测试。刺激率范围为每个电极200至5000多赫兹,具体取决于设备、使用的电极数量和刺激策略。在受试者接收实验处理器之前,还使用其原来的处理器对相同材料进行了测试。所有测试均在安静的聆听条件下进行,在数据收集之前,受试者基本没有使用过实验处理器。受试者使用原来的处理器时得分最高。对于使用不同刺激率的处理器,受试者的语音理解得分几乎没有差异。仅在最低刺激率和使用非交错脉冲的高刺激率下,语音识别明显较差。使用8、12或16个电极的处理器的语音识别相似。只有4电极处理器的表现明显较差。这些结果表明,目前使用商业植入物的患者无法充分利用当前语音处理器提供的频谱信息通道数量。此外,结果表明,作为刺激率的函数,性能没有显著变化,这表明至少在安静聆听条件下,高刺激率不会改善对语音中时间线索的获取。