Jorgensen J H, Doern G V, Ferraro M J, Knapp C C, Swenson J M, Washington J A
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78184-7750.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):961-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.961-966.1992.
A five-laboratory collaborative study was undertaken to determine the precision and accuracy of broth microdilution susceptibility tests of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates performed with Haemophilus test medium (HTM) compared with tests performed with lysed horse blood-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth (LHB). The intra-and interlaboratory reproducibilities of MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents determined with the two media were found to be quite similar and highly reproducible in both media. On the basis of favorable performance in this study, S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 is recommended as a quality control strain to assess the performance of HTM when this medium is used for testing of pneumococci. Testing of 293 unique clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae with both media in the respective participant laboratories allowed a direct comparison of MIC results and a calculation of interpretive error rates. Although there were some slight differences between MICs determined with HTM and MICs determined with LHB, few very major or major errors resulted from testing the clinical isolates against the 10 antimicrobial agents. However, MIC-interpretive criteria specific for S. pneumoniae should be developed and promulgated through a national consensus mechanism.
开展了一项由五个实验室参与的协作研究,以确定用嗜血杆菌试验培养基(HTM)对肺炎链球菌分离株进行肉汤微量稀释药敏试验的精密度和准确性,并与用补充了溶解马血的穆勒-欣顿肉汤(LHB)进行的试验作比较。结果发现,用这两种培养基测定的10种抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)在实验室内和实验室间的重现性非常相似,且在两种培养基中都具有很高的重现性。基于本研究中的良好表现,推荐将肺炎链球菌ATCC 49619作为质量控制菌株,用于评估HTM用于肺炎球菌检测时的性能。各参与实验室用这两种培养基对293株独特的肺炎链球菌临床分离株进行检测,从而能够直接比较MIC结果并计算解释错误率。虽然用HTM测定的MIC和用LHB测定的MIC之间存在一些细微差异,但用这10种抗菌药物检测临床分离株时,很少出现极重大或重大错误。然而,应通过全国共识机制制定并公布针对肺炎链球菌的MIC解释标准。