Donders J
Department of Psychology, Mary Free Bed Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI 49503.
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Mar;48(2):225-30. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<225::aid-jclp2270480213>3.0.co;2-s.
The K-ABC and WISC-R were administered to 43 children with traumatic brain injury. The amount of shared variance between standard score indices of these two tests ranged from 42% to 71%, depending on which scores were considered. Correlations with degree of cerebral impairment, as measured by length of coma, were slightly higher for WISC-R IQ scores than for K-ABC global scale scores. Performance on both the K-ABC and the WISC-R was affected by the presence or absence of ocular and/or motor deficits. It is concluded that the K-ABC is not superior to the WISC-R in sensitivity to cerebral impairment and that caution is needed when one is making neuropsychological interpretations on the basis of the K-ABC.
对43名脑外伤儿童进行了考夫曼儿童成套评估测验（K-ABC）和韦克斯勒儿童智力量表修订版（WISC-R）测试。根据所考虑的分数不同，这两项测试标准分数指数之间的共同方差量在42%至71%之间。用昏迷时长衡量的脑损伤程度与韦克斯勒儿童智力量表修订版智商分数的相关性略高于与考夫曼儿童成套评估测验整体量表分数的相关性。考夫曼儿童成套评估测验和韦克斯勒儿童智力量表修订版的表现都受到有无视觉和/或运动缺陷的影响。得出的结论是，考夫曼儿童成套评估测验在对脑损伤的敏感性方面并不优于韦克斯勒儿童智力量表修订版，并且在基于考夫曼儿童成套评估测验进行神经心理学解释时需要谨慎。
