Suppr超能文献

宽容性尼古丁监管作为传统烟草控制的补充措施。

Permissive nicotine regulation as a complement to traditional tobacco control.

作者信息

Sumner Walton

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St, Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2005 Feb 24;5:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking takes a staggering toll on human health and attracts considerable public health attention, yet real solutions seem distant. The 2004 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (US Senate bill S2461) would have given the US Food and Drug Administration limited authority to regulate cigarettes to "protect the public health." However, such legislation is unlikely to substantially reduce smoking or related deaths.

DISCUSSION

The past 500 years of tobacco control efforts demonstrate that nicotine prohibition is a practical impossibility for numerous reasons, state revenue being one of the most ominous. The FDA already has regulatory authority over pharmaceutical grade nicotine products, and requires pharmacists to dispense the most addictive of these only with prescriptions. Meanwhile, every corner store can sell far more addictive and dangerous cigarettes to any adult. The FDA could immediately increase competition between cigarettes and clean nicotine products by approving available nicotine products for over-the-counter sales to adults. Similarly permissive regulation of cigarettes and addictive nicotine products will reduce tobacco use and improve smokers' health, but increase nicotine use in the population. Fortunately, restricted youth access and accurate labeling of nicotine's absolute risks will dissuade many non-smokers from experimenting with it, while accurate depiction of its risks relative to cigarette smoking will encourage many smokers to switch. The FDA could take a series of small steps that might ultimately replace a large proportion of cigarette smoking with equally addictive nicotine products, without risking serious public health setbacks. Vaccine, methadone, and injury prevention policies establish relevant public health precedents.

SUMMARY

Cigarettes, or an equally addictive alternative, will be a permanent and common product in most societies. Regulations restricting only the safest addictive nicotine products are hard to justify. Addictive nicotine compliments other tobacco control strategies. Modern tobacco control policies are applicable to addictive nicotine. Controlled trials and test market studies are urgently needed to evaluate addictive nicotine as an alternative to smoking. Meanwhile, legislators should preserve the Food and Drug Administration's option to permit non-prescription sales of addictive nicotine.

摘要

背景

吸烟对人类健康造成了惊人的损害,引起了公众健康领域的广泛关注,但真正的解决方案似乎仍遥不可及。2004年的《家庭吸烟预防与烟草控制法案》(美国参议院法案S2461)本可赋予美国食品药品监督管理局有限权力来监管香烟,以“保护公众健康”。然而,此类立法不太可能大幅减少吸烟行为或相关死亡人数。

讨论

过去500年的烟草控制努力表明,出于诸多原因,禁止尼古丁在实际操作中是不可能的,其中政府税收是最不利的因素之一。美国食品药品监督管理局已经对药用级尼古丁产品拥有监管权,并要求药剂师仅凭处方分发其中成瘾性最强的产品。与此同时,每个街角商店都能向任何成年人出售成瘾性更强且更危险的香烟。美国食品药品监督管理局可以通过批准现有的尼古丁产品供成年人非处方销售来立即增强香烟与纯净尼古丁产品之间的竞争。对香烟和成瘾性尼古丁产品采取类似的宽松监管将减少烟草使用并改善吸烟者健康,但会增加人群中的尼古丁使用量。幸运的是,限制年轻人获取以及准确标注尼古丁的确切风险将劝阻许多非吸烟者尝试使用它,而准确描述其相对于吸烟的风险将鼓励许多吸烟者转而使用它。美国食品药品监督管理局可以采取一系列小步骤,最终可能用同样成瘾性的尼古丁产品取代很大一部分吸烟行为,而不会有严重危害公众健康的风险。疫苗、美沙酮和伤害预防政策都确立了相关公共卫生先例。

总结

香烟或同样成瘾的替代品在大多数社会中将是一种长期且常见的产品。仅限制最安全的成瘾性尼古丁产品的法规很难说得通。成瘾性尼古丁可补充其他烟草控制策略。现代烟草控制政策适用于成瘾性尼古丁。迫切需要进行对照试验和试销市场研究,以评估成瘾性尼古丁作为吸烟替代品的效果。与此同时,立法者应保留美国食品药品监督管理局允许非处方销售成瘾性尼古丁的选项。

相似文献

6
Public Health Policies on E-Cigarettes.电子烟公共卫生政策。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 28;21(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1204-y.

本文引用的文献

2
Advances in pharmacotherapy for tobacco dependence.烟草依赖的药物治疗进展。
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2004 May;9(1):39-53. doi: 10.1517/eoed.9.1.39.32951.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验