Anthony T Renée, Flynn Michael R, Eisner Alfred
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, UNC, School of Public Health, 118 Rosenau Hall, CB 7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Mar;49(2):179-93. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh082.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and numerical investigations of particle inhalability and contaminant exposure have used simple geometrical surrogates for a breathing human form, but the effect of eliminating facial features has not been investigated. In this work, the velocity field and particle aspiration associated with two differently shaped mannequins were investigated to determine if an elliptical form was sufficient to represent the complexity of fluid flow associated with an inhaling human. Laser Doppler anemometry was used to measure velocity, and both optical sizing and gravimetric analysis were used to measure particle aspiration from an aerosol source. All tests were performed with continuous inhalation through the mouth, with the mannequin facing the 0.3 m s(-1) freestream. Although limitations in the laser Doppler optics prevented velocity measurements at distances <11 mm in front of the mannequin mouth opening, significant velocity differences were identified up to 20 mm in front of the mouth opening. This indicated that facial features affected the flow field near the face only. Owing to these differences, particle aspiration was compared between mannequins for three different velocity ratio conditions using an aerosol source. Even with relatively large variability in the aspirated concentration in this study, the aspirated mass concentration was significantly less for the anatomical mannequin relative to the elliptical form. Thus, the simplified elliptical cylinder does not sufficiently characterize the fluid dynamics near the mouth of an inhaling human form at these limited test conditions. Future CFD and numerical simulations to investigate human aspiration of particles should incorporate the complex features of the human face to investigate adequately particle aspiration in low velocity environments.
计算流体动力学(CFD)以及对颗粒可吸入性和污染物暴露的数值研究,使用简单的几何替代物来模拟呼吸的人体形态,但尚未研究消除面部特征的影响。在这项工作中,研究了与两种不同形状人体模型相关的速度场和颗粒吸入情况,以确定椭圆形是否足以代表与吸气人体相关的流体流动复杂性。使用激光多普勒测速仪测量速度,并使用光学粒度分析和重量分析来测量来自气溶胶源的颗粒吸入情况。所有测试均通过口腔持续吸气进行,人体模型面向0.3 m s(-1)的自由流。尽管激光多普勒光学系统的局限性使得无法在人体模型口腔开口前方<11 mm的距离处进行速度测量,但在口腔开口前方20 mm处仍发现了显著的速度差异。这表明面部特征仅影响面部附近的流场。由于这些差异,使用气溶胶源在三种不同速度比条件下比较了人体模型之间的颗粒吸入情况。即使在本研究中吸入浓度存在相对较大的变异性,但相对于椭圆形人体模型,解剖学人体模型的吸入质量浓度明显更低。因此,在这些有限的测试条件下,简化的椭圆圆柱体不足以表征吸气人体口腔附近的流体动力学。未来用于研究人体颗粒吸入的CFD和数值模拟应纳入人脸的复杂特征,以便在低速环境中充分研究颗粒吸入情况。