Tonner Peter H, Wei Cui, Bein Berthold, Weiler Norbert, Paris Andrea, Scholz Jens
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):580-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000156291.04287.7f.
Comparison of two versions of bispectral index (BIS) derived from the electroencephalogram in mechanically ventilated and continuously sedated patients after major abdominal surgery.
Prospective, cohort, observational, unblinded study.
Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Forty-six patients undergoing major abdominal surgery scheduled for postoperative mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation.
Patients were continuously sedated using propofol and sufentanil.
Electrodes for determination of BIS were placed at the forehead of the patients according to the manufacturer's specifications immediately after arrival to the intensive care unit. The level of consciousness was assessed every 2 hrs by a clinical sedation scale (Ramsay sedation scale, levels 1-6). BIS, electromyographic activity, and signal quality index were recorded simultaneously at the same time as the Ramsay scale for 24 hrs or until patients were ready for extubation. BIS (version 2.10) and BIS XP (version 3.12) were determined at 2-hr intervals. BIS and BIS XP showed a high correlation of readings (rs = .79, p < .01). However, the methods did not yield identical results. Both variables were significantly influenced by electromyographic activity, especially at high values, whereas there was only a weak correlation with body temperature. Some of the deeply sedated patients (Ramsay 5 or 6) had BIS readings >80 (BIS, 16%; BIS XP, 13%; p = not significant).
The newer algorithm BIS XP did not perform better than the previous version BIS in patients after major surgery who were mechanically ventilated and sedated on an intensive care unit. This precludes the use of BIS or BIS XP for distinguishing, among deeply sedated ICU patients, those with and without preserved cerebral electrical activity.
比较在接受腹部大手术且机械通气并持续镇静的患者中,两种源自脑电图的脑电双频指数(BIS)版本。
前瞻性队列观察性非盲研究。
大学医院的外科重症监护病房。
46例计划接受腹部大手术并术后进行机械通气和持续镇静的患者。
使用丙泊酚和舒芬太尼对患者进行持续镇静。
到达重症监护病房后,立即按照制造商的规格将用于测定BIS的电极置于患者前额。每2小时通过临床镇静量表( Ramsay镇静量表,1 - 6级)评估意识水平。在使用Ramsay量表评估的同时,同步记录24小时或直至患者准备好拔管时的BIS、肌电活动和信号质量指数。每隔2小时测定一次BIS(版本2.10)和BIS XP(版本3.12)。BIS和BIS XP的读数显示出高度相关性(rs = 0.79,p < 0.01)。然而,两种方法并未得出相同的结果。两个变量均受肌电活动的显著影响,尤其是在高值时,而与体温的相关性较弱。一些深度镇静的患者(Ramsay 5或6级)的BIS读数>80(BIS为16%;BIS XP为13%;p无显著性差异)。
在外科重症监护病房接受机械通气并镇静的大手术后患者中,较新的算法BIS XP并不比先前版本的BIS表现更好。这使得在深度镇静的重症监护病房患者中,无法使用BIS或BIS XP来区分脑电活动是否保留。