Ely E Wesley, Truman Brenda, Manzi Donna J, Sigl Jeffrey C, Shintani Ayumi, Bernard Gordon R
Tennessee Valley Veteran's Affairs Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1537-43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2298-1. Epub 2004 May 4.
Bispectral index (BIS) is being evaluated as a monitor of consciousness, yet it is unclear what components of consciousness (i.e., arousal vs. content of consciousness) the BIS measures. This study compared BIS levels to well-validated clinical measures of arousal and the presence or absence of delirium.
A prospective, blinded, observational cohort study.
124 mechanically ventilated, adult, medical ICU patients.
Using BIS 3.4 and BIS-XP 4.0 algorithms, BIS values were calculated immediately prior to clinical assessments. The clinical assessments included the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and presence or absence of delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. A total of 484 assessments were collected among 124 patients. BIS-XP values demonstrated greater correlation with RASS than BIS 3.4 ( R(2)=0.36 vs. 0.20), although considerable overlap of BIS-XP scores remained across RASS levels. Median BIS-XP values for delirious and nondelirious observations were 74 and 96, respectively, while BIS 3.4 values were 91 and 96, respectively. However, neither BIS 3.4 nor BIS-XP were significantly associated with delirium after controlling for RASS value.
In comparison with clinical measures of arousal in mechanically ventilated patients, BIS-XP algorithm demonstrated stronger correlation with RASS levels than did BIS 3.4, yet marked overlap across different levels of arousal persist using both algorithms. After controlling for level of arousal, neither BIS-XP nor BIS 3.4 algorithms distinguished between the presence and absence of delirium.
双谱指数(BIS)正被评估作为意识监测指标,但尚不清楚BIS所测量的意识组成部分(即觉醒与意识内容)是什么。本研究将BIS水平与经过充分验证的觉醒临床指标以及谵妄的存在与否进行了比较。
一项前瞻性、盲法、观察性队列研究。
124例接受机械通气的成年内科重症监护病房患者。
使用BIS 3.4和BIS-XP 4.0算法,在临床评估前即刻计算BIS值。临床评估包括使用里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)以及采用重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法评估谵妄的存在与否。共收集了124例患者的484次评估数据。BIS-XP值与RASS的相关性高于BIS 3.4(R² = 0.36对0.20),尽管不同RASS水平下BIS-XP分数仍有相当程度的重叠。谵妄和非谵妄观察的BIS-XP中位数分别为74和96,而BIS 3.4值分别为91和96。然而,在控制RASS值后,BIS 3.4和BIS-XP与谵妄均无显著相关性。
与机械通气患者的觉醒临床指标相比,BIS-XP算法与RASS水平的相关性强于BIS 3.4,但两种算法在不同觉醒水平之间仍存在明显重叠。在控制觉醒水平后,BIS-XP和BIS 3.4算法均无法区分谵妄的存在与否。