Suppr超能文献

Lung edema formation during cold perfusion: important differences between rat and porcine lung.

作者信息

Wierup Per, Liao Quiming, Bolys Ramunas, Sjöberg Trygve, Rippe Bengt, Steen Stig

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Skejby Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Apr;24(4):379-85. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.03.024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different perfusion pressures on edema formation during cold flush perfusion with the 2 most commonly used preservation solutions in clinical lung transplantation: Euro-Collins and Perfadex solutions.

METHODS

Isolated rat and porcine lungs were perfused for 3 minutes at 4 degrees C to 8 degrees C at a pressure of either 10, 15 or 20 mm Hg. Weight gain was recorded continuously. Weight gain per minute was calculated after the first phase of rapid weight gain was completed.

RESULTS

In the rat model, perfusion pressure of 10 mm Hg resulted in a macro- and microscopically apparent edema, irrespective of the type of preservation solution. Perfusion pressures of 10, 15 and 20 mm Hg have weight gains of 100%, 150% and 350%, respectively, after 3 minutes of perfusion. The corresponding weight gain per minute was 18%, 31% and 84% of the initial weight. There were no statistically significant differences in weight gain between the different solutions at equal perfusion pressure. In the porcine model the flow was extremely low at 10 mm Hg and no weight gain was registered, whereas the weight gain per minute at 15 and 20 mm Hg was 1.0% and 2.1% of the initial weight.

CONCLUSIONS

In porcine lungs, cold perfusion at 20 mm Hg gives minimal edema formulation, whereas in rat lungs the edema formation is deleterious, irrespective of the solution used.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验