Eriksen Kasper Astrup
Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Sölvegatan 14A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Theor Biol Med Model. 2005 Apr 8;2:15. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-2-15.
How DNA repair enzymes find the relatively rare sites of damage is not known in great detail. Recent experiments and molecular data suggest that individual repair enzymes do not work independently of each other, but interact with each other through charges exchanged along the DNA. A damaged site in the DNA hinders this exchange. The hypothesis is that the charge exchange quickly liberates the repair enzymes from error-free stretches of DNA. In this way, the sites of damage are located more quickly; but how much more quickly is not known, nor is it known whether the charge exchange mechanism has other observable consequences.
Here the size of the speed-up gained from this charge exchange mechanism is calculated and the characteristic length and time scales are identified. In particular, for Escherichia coli, I estimate the speed-up is 50000/N, where N is the number of repair enzymes participating in the charge exchange mechanism. Even though N is not exactly known, a speed-up of order 10 is not entirely unreasonable. Furthermore, upon over expression of all the repair enzymes, the location time only varies as N-1/2 and not as 1/N.
The revolutionary hypothesis that DNA repair enzymes use charge exchange along DNA to locate damaged sites more efficiently is actually sound from a purely theoretical point of view. Furthermore, the predicted collective behavior of the location time is important in assessing the impact of stress-ful and radioactive environments on individual cell mutation rates.
DNA修复酶如何找到相对罕见的损伤位点,目前尚不清楚。最近的实验和分子数据表明,单个修复酶并非彼此独立发挥作用,而是通过沿DNA交换的电荷相互作用。DNA中的损伤位点会阻碍这种交换。假说是电荷交换能迅速将修复酶从无错误的DNA片段中释放出来。通过这种方式,损伤位点能更快被定位;但快多少尚不清楚,电荷交换机制是否还有其他可观察到的后果也不清楚。
这里计算了从这种电荷交换机制获得的加速大小,并确定了特征长度和时间尺度。特别是对于大肠杆菌,我估计加速为50000/N,其中N是参与电荷交换机制的修复酶数量。尽管N并不确切知晓,但10倍左右的加速并非完全不合理。此外,当所有修复酶过度表达时,定位时间仅随N的-1/2次方变化,而不是随1/N变化。
DNA修复酶利用沿DNA的电荷交换更有效地定位损伤位点这一革命性假说,从纯粹理论角度来看实际上是合理的。此外,预测的定位时间的集体行为对于评估应激和放射性环境对个体细胞突变率的影响很重要。