• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)能为未来做规划吗?食物选择中的时间近视研究。

Can squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) plan for the future? Studies of temporal myopia in food choice.

作者信息

McKenzie Tammy, Cherman Taryn, Bird Leanne R, Naqshbandi Mariam, Roberts William A

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2004 Nov;32(4):377-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03196035.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196035
PMID:15825880
Abstract

In seven experiments, 2 squirrel monkeys were given choices between arrays of food that varied in the quantity offered. In Experiments 1-5, the monkeys were offered choices between quantities of the same food that varied in a 2:1 ratio. The squirrel monkeys failed to show the temporal myopia effect or a decrease in preference for the larger quantity as the absolute number of food items offered increased. Even when given choices of 8 versus 16 peanuts and 10 versus 20 peanuts, both monkeys significantly preferred the larger quantity. An examination of the monkeys' rates of consumption indicated that 20 peanuts were consumed over a 1- to 2-h period, with eating bouts separated by periods of nonconsumption. In Experiments 6A, 6B, and 7, food was either pilfered or replenished 15 min after an initial choice, so that choice of the smaller quantity led to more total food in the long run. These manipulations caused both monkeys to reduce choice of the larger quantity, relative to baseline choice. The results suggest that squirrel monkeys anticipated the future consequences of their choices.

摘要

在七项实验中,给两只松鼠猴提供了不同数量食物阵列的选择。在实验1 - 5中,猴子们在数量比例为2:1的同一种食物之间进行选择。随着提供的食物绝对数量增加,松鼠猴没有表现出时间近视效应,也没有对较大数量食物的偏好降低。即使给猴子提供8颗与16颗花生以及10颗与20颗花生的选择,两只猴子都显著偏好较大数量。对猴子的消耗速率检查表明,20颗花生在1至2小时内被吃完,进食时段之间有不进食的间隔。在实验6A、6B和7中,在最初选择15分钟后,食物要么被偷走,要么被补充,这样从长远来看,选择较小数量的食物会导致总食物量更多。这些操作使两只猴子相对于基线选择减少了对较大数量食物的选择。结果表明松鼠猴会预期它们选择的未来后果。

相似文献

1
Can squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) plan for the future? Studies of temporal myopia in food choice.松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)能为未来做规划吗?食物选择中的时间近视研究。
Learn Behav. 2004 Nov;32(4):377-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03196035.
2
Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) choose smaller food arrays: long-term retention, choice with nonpreferred food, and transposition.松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)会选择更小的食物阵列:长期保留、与非偏好食物的选择以及换位。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):58-64. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.1.58.
3
Judgements of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)对数字符号的顺序判断与求和
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jul;23(3):325-39. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.3.325.
4
Anticipation of future events in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) and rats (Rattus norvegicus): tests of the Bischof-Kohler hypothesis.松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)和大鼠(褐家鼠)对未来事件的预期:比绍夫-科勒假说的检验
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):345-57. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.4.34.
5
A comparison of food preferences and nutrient composition in captive squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus, and pigtail macaques, Macaca nemestrina.圈养松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)和豚尾猕猴(豚尾猕猴属)的食物偏好与营养成分比较
Physiol Behav. 2001 May;73(1-2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00439-5.
6
Capuchins (Sapajus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) fail to attend to the functional spatial relationship between a tool and a reward.卷尾猴(僧面猴属 白喉卷尾猴)和松鼠猴(松鼠猴属 松鼠猴)无法注意到工具与奖励之间的功能性空间关系。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):463-473. doi: 10.1037/com0000179. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Impact of stimulus format and reward value on quantity discrimination in capuchin and squirrel monkeys.刺激形式和奖励价值对卷尾猴和松鼠猴数量辨别能力的影响。
Learn Behav. 2018 Mar;46(1):89-100. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0295-9.
8
A study of long-term odor memory in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Jun;110(2):125-30. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.2.125.
9
Reverse-reward learning in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): retesting after 5 years, and assessment on qualitative transfer.松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)的反向奖励学习:5年后的重新测试及定性迁移评估
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Feb;125(1):84-90. doi: 10.1037/a0021041.
10
Delay of gratification in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)和松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)的延迟满足。
J Comp Psychol. 2010 May;124(2):205-10. doi: 10.1037/a0018240.

引用本文的文献

1
Fairly flexible: brown-tufted capuchins and a squirrel monkey adjust their motor responses in a foraging task.相当灵活:棕色簇毛卷尾猴和松鼠猴在觅食任务中调整它们的运动反应。
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 12;13:e19023. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19023. eCollection 2025.
2
Intrinsic anticipatory motives in non-human primate food consumption behavior.非人灵长类动物食物消费行为中的内在预期动机。
iScience. 2024 Mar 8;27(4):109459. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109459. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
3
Innovative multi-material tool use in the pant-hoot display of a chimpanzee.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure.在“自我控制”范式中的选择:消退程序的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):11-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-11.
2
Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets over extended time periods.黑猩猩能在很长一段时间内记住往食物堆中逐个添加食物后的结果。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502004.x.
3
Spatial memory for food hidden by rats (Rattus norvegicus) on the radial maze: studies of memory for where, what, and when.
黑猩猩“砰砰”叫声展示中的创新性多材料工具使用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 29;12(1):20605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24770-w.
4
Five Breakthroughs: A First Approximation of Brain Evolution From Early Bilaterians to Humans.五大突破:从早期两侧对称动物到人类大脑进化的初步近似
Front Neuroanat. 2021 Aug 17;15:693346. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.693346. eCollection 2021.
5
What Behavioral Abilities Emerged at Key Milestones in Human Brain Evolution? 13 Hypotheses on the 600-Million-Year Phylogenetic History of Human Intelligence.人类大脑进化关键节点出现了哪些行为能力?关于人类智力6亿年系统发育史的13种假说。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:685853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685853. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of stimulus format and reward value on quantity discrimination in capuchin and squirrel monkeys.刺激形式和奖励价值对卷尾猴和松鼠猴数量辨别能力的影响。
Learn Behav. 2018 Mar;46(1):89-100. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0295-9.
7
Cup tool use by squirrel monkeys.松鼠猴对杯子工具的使用。
Am J Primatol. 2015 Dec;77(12):1323-32. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22486. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
Animals represent the past and the future.动物代表着过去和未来。
Evol Psychol. 2013;11(3):573-90. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100307.
9
Coding of Stimuli by Animals: Retrospection, Prospection, Episodic Memory and Future Planning.动物对刺激的编码:回顾、展望、情景记忆与未来规划。
Learn Motiv. 2010 Nov 1;41(4):225-240. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2010.08.001.
10
Prospective Memory in a Language-Trained Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).一只接受语言训练的黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)的前瞻性记忆。
Learn Motiv. 2012 Nov 1;43(4):192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):176-87. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.176.
4
Two tests of the stuck-in-time hypothesis.
J Gen Psychol. 2002 Oct;129(4):415-29. doi: 10.1080/00221300209602105.
5
Are animals stuck in time?动物被困在时间里吗?
Psychol Bull. 2002 May;128(3):473-89. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.473.
6
Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays.经验和社会环境对灌丛鸦前瞻性贮藏策略的影响。
Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):443-6. doi: 10.1038/35106560.
7
Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) form integrated memories of the multiple features of caching episodes.灌丛鸦(Aphelocoma coerulescens)会对贮藏事件的多个特征形成整合记忆。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jan;27(1):17-29.
8
Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys.半野生恒河猴的自发数字表征
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):829-33. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1078.
9
Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember the relative time of caching as well as the location and content of their caches.灌丛鸦(Aphelocoma coerulescens)能记住贮藏的相对时间以及贮藏地点和所藏食物的内容。
J Comp Psychol. 1999 Dec;113(4):403-16. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.403.
10
Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays.灌丛鸦在找回贮藏物时类似情景记忆的表现。
Nature. 1998 Sep 17;395(6699):272-4. doi: 10.1038/26216.