[Analysis of operative patterns of 2272 laparoscopic hysterectomies].

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of four different operative patterns of laparoscopic hysterectomy: laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), laparoscopically introfasial subtotal hysterectomy (LISH), laparoscopically subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) and laparoscopically total hysterectomy (LTH).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on 2272 cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy was carried out, including operating time, blood loss, complication and postoperative recovery.

RESULTS

For the two groups which preserved cervix, LISH was performed in 1323 cases. The operating time was (91 +/- 21) min, blood loss (93 +/- 23) ml, complication rate 4.1%. LSH was conducted in 229 cases, with an operating time (70 +/- 18) min, blood loss (69 +/- 17) ml, complication rate 0. The difference between the two groups was significant (all P < 0.01). For the two groups which excised cervix, LAVH was performed in 588 cases, with an operating time (119 +/- 28) min, blood loss (156 +/- 23) ml, complication rate 1.5%; while LTH was carried out in 132 cases, with an operating time (121 +/- 30) min, blood loss (193 +/- 38) ml, complication rate 1.2%. There were no significant differences between the two groups (all P > 0.05). All patients recovered well postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The four operative patterns are ideal for hysterectomy. Young patients should be operated with laparoscopic hysterectomy with preservation of cervix, old patients or patients with CIN should be operated with excision of cervix.